X-Received: by 10.107.16.31 with SMTP id y31mr7969463ioi.1.1466160070236; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 03:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.29.98 with SMTP id a89mr401299qga.18.1466160070107; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 03:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!v48no3145513qgd.0!news-out.google.com!v8ni544qgv.0!nntp.google.com!31no1498582qgh.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: it.comp.java
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 03:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <492e8071-26ad-4d36-bf87-e34b2283d641@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=94.95.219.10; posting-account=jLXPIgoAAAArS8q-cBrGz_oGM1n38kKX
NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.95.219.10
References: <1139402866.733662.35900@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <520917cc-6fa4-40d8-a9ce-7c3034727251@googlegroups.com> <fece74d6-7cdc-4b4c-b250-e0e553289653@googlegroups.com> <67f880f1-af1d-44ca-b10e-d11fb7593883@googlegroups.com> <ca93fb7f-4250-491f-b105-920200e905a6@googlegroups.com> <3a42fe9d-628f-49c5-89f0-9eaceb810706@googlegroups.com> <d9054a1a-6cf3-4988-addc-25467b20f614@googlegroups.com> <492e8071-26ad-4d36-bf87-e34b2283d641@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f93370da-4868-4d28-b356-72bc0c8f693e@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Java e C++
From: fabio.vianello.1966@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:41:10 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 20
Xref: csiph.com it.comp.java:8932

Il giorno venerd=C3=AC 17 giugno 2016 12:34:44 UTC+2, 4ndre4 ha scritto:
> On Friday, 17 June 2016 11:26:36 UTC+1, fabio.via...@gmail.com  wrote:
>=20
> [...]
> > Quando guardi un thread dai un occhio anche alla data in cui =C3=A8 sta=
to inserito, nel 2006 aveva un senso confrontare i due linguaggi in termini=
 di performance.=20
>=20
> Non ha MAI avuto senso.
>=20
> > Adesso ha poco senso.
>=20
> E allora perche` scrivi?

Si infatti le performance della versione 1.0 di Java erano nettamente super=
iori in qualsiasi piattaforma rispetto al C++.=20


Scrivo e lo dico per l'ultima volta per le risposte sgarbate e ingnoranti d=
ate in passato.