Re: Java e C++

X-Received	by 10.107.16.31 with SMTP id y31mr7969463ioi.1.1466160070236; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 03:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received	by 10.140.29.98 with SMTP id a89mr401299qga.18.1466160070107; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 03:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path	csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!v48no3145513qgd.0!news-out.google.com!v8ni544qgv.0!nntp.google.com!31no1498582qgh.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups	it.comp.java
Date	Fri, 17 Jun 2016 03:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<492e8071-26ad-4d36-bf87-e34b2283d641@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=94.95.219.10; posting-account=jLXPIgoAAAArS8q-cBrGz_oGM1n38kKX
NNTP-Posting-Host	94.95.219.10
References	<1139402866.733662.35900@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <520917cc-6fa4-40d8-a9ce-7c3034727251@googlegroups.com> <fece74d6-7cdc-4b4c-b250-e0e553289653@googlegroups.com> <67f880f1-af1d-44ca-b10e-d11fb7593883@googlegroups.com> <ca93fb7f-4250-491f-b105-920200e905a6@googlegroups.com> <3a42fe9d-628f-49c5-89f0-9eaceb810706@googlegroups.com> <d9054a1a-6cf3-4988-addc-25467b20f614@googlegroups.com> <492e8071-26ad-4d36-bf87-e34b2283d641@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent	G2/1.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Message-ID	<f93370da-4868-4d28-b356-72bc0c8f693e@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Java e C++
From	fabio.vianello.1966@gmail.com
Injection-Date	Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:41:10 +0000
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
Lines	20
Xref	csiph.com it.comp.java:8932

Show key headers only | View raw

Il giorno venerdì 17 giugno 2016 12:34:44 UTC+2, 4ndre4 ha scritto:
> On Friday, 17 June 2016 11:26:36 UTC+1, fabio.via...@gmail.com  wrote:
> 
> [...]
> > Quando guardi un thread dai un occhio anche alla data in cui è stato inserito, nel 2006 aveva un senso confrontare i due linguaggi in termini di performance. 
> 
> Non ha MAI avuto senso.
> 
> > Adesso ha poco senso.
> 
> E allora perche` scrivi?

Si infatti le performance della versione 1.0 di Java erano nettamente superiori in qualsiasi piattaforma rispetto al C++. 

Scrivo e lo dico per l'ultima volta per le risposte sgarbate e ingnoranti date in passato.

Back to it.comp.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Java e C++ fabio.vianello.1966@gmail.com - 2016-06-16 07:52 -0700
  Re: Java e C++ Cicap <forzatonino@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 14:01 -0700
    Re: Java e C++ fabio.vianello.1966@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 01:29 -0700
      Re: Java e C++ fabio.vianello.1966@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 01:41 -0700
        Re: Java e C++ fabio.vianello.1966@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 01:45 -0700
        Re: Java e C++ fabio.vianello.1966@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 01:46 -0700
          Re: Java e C++ 4ndre4 <a.laforgia@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 02:46 -0700
            Re: Java e C++ fabio.vianello.1966@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 03:12 -0700
              Re: Java e C++ 4ndre4 <a.laforgia@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 03:33 -0700
                Re: Java e C++ fabio.vianello.1966@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 03:38 -0700
      Re: Java e C++ Cicap <forzatonino@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 02:10 -0700
        Re: Java e C++ fabio.vianello.1966@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 03:11 -0700
          Re: Java e C++ fabio.vianello.1966@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 03:26 -0700
            Re: Java e C++ 4ndre4 <a.laforgia@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 03:34 -0700
              Re: Java e C++ fabio.vianello.1966@gmail.com - 2016-06-17 03:41 -0700

csiph-web