Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Ingo Schwarze Newsgroups: gnu.groff.bug Subject: [bug #51362] [PATCH]: Add a synonym for the font "CW" Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:11:25 -0400 (EDT) Lines: 23 Approved: bug-groff@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20170702-210337.sv93188.36149@savannah.gnu.org> <20170713-223627.sv93188.41646@savannah.gnu.org> <20170901-193727.sv96214.69650@savannah.gnu.org> <20171121-081024.sv108747.61978@savannah.gnu.org> <20171121-082019.sv108747.35886@savannah.gnu.org> <20171121-082038.sv108747.89342@savannah.gnu.org> <20200723-132115.sv108747.15154@savannah.gnu.org> <20200723-141124.sv97361.34126@savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1595513487 25176 209.51.188.17 (23 Jul 2020 14:11:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: "G. Branden Robinson" , Bjarni Ingi Gislason , Bertrand Garrigues , Ingo Schwarze , bug-groff@gnu.org Envelope-to: bug-groff@gnu.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1001:sendmail.php X-Savane-Server: savannah.gnu.org:443 [209.51.188.72] X-Savane-Project: groff X-Savane-Tracker: bugs X-Savane-Item-ID: 51362 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD amd64; rv:77.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/77.0 X-Apparently-From: 87.173.114.25 (Savane authenticated user schwarze) In-Reply-To: <20200723-132115.sv108747.15154@savannah.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: bug-groff@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for the GNU version of nroff, troff et al" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <20200723-141124.sv97361.34126@savannah.gnu.org> X-Mailman-Original-References: <20170702-210337.sv93188.36149@savannah.gnu.org> <20170713-223627.sv93188.41646@savannah.gnu.org> <20170901-193727.sv96214.69650@savannah.gnu.org> <20171121-081024.sv108747.61978@savannah.gnu.org> <20171121-082019.sv108747.35886@savannah.gnu.org> <20171121-082038.sv108747.89342@savannah.gnu.org> <20200723-132115.sv108747.15154@savannah.gnu.org> Xref: csiph.com gnu.groff.bug:1913 Follow-up Comment #4, bug #51362 (project groff): The bad practice of requesting \f(CW or .ft CW in man(7) pages is widespread enough that mandoc(1) has been supporting it for backward compatibility for many years. In practice, \f(CW is clearly used more often than the more logical \f(CR (which mandoc also supports, but nor for such a long time). That said, your point seems fair to me that there is nothing wrong with warning authors about this particular kind of bad practice. Support for \f[C] is clearly not needed. I don't recall encountering that in a manual page at all, ever. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/