Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From: "G. Branden Robinson" <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gnu.groff.bug
Subject: [bug #58736] -me macros: footnote breaks two-column output
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 00:04:50 -0400 (EDT)
Lines: 17
Approved: bug-groff@gnu.org
Message-ID: <mailman.10.1595045091.24492.bug-groff@gnu.org>
References: <20200708-124028.sv93119.58532@savannah.gnu.org> <20200717-030230.sv108747.10676@savannah.gnu.org> <20200718-040450.sv108747.46573@savannah.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1595045092 6464 209.51.188.17 (18 Jul 2020 04:04:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu
To: "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>, Dave <saint.snit@gmail.com>, bug-groff@gnu.org
Envelope-to: bug-groff@gnu.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1001:sendmail.php
X-Savane-Server: savannah.gnu.org:443 [209.51.188.72]
X-Savane-Project: groff
X-Savane-Tracker: bugs
X-Savane-Item-ID: 58736
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0
X-Apparently-From: 1.129.110.177 (Savane authenticated user gbranden)
In-Reply-To: <20200717-030230.sv108747.10676@savannah.gnu.org>
X-BeenThere: bug-groff@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bug reports for the GNU version of nroff, troff et al" <bug-groff.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-groff>, <mailto:bug-groff-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-groff>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-groff@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-groff-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff>, <mailto:bug-groff-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <20200718-040450.sv108747.46573@savannah.gnu.org>
X-Mailman-Original-References: <20200708-124028.sv93119.58532@savannah.gnu.org> <20200717-030230.sv108747.10676@savannah.gnu.org>
Xref: csiph.com gnu.groff.bug:1904

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #58736 (project groff):

I guess a reasonable next step is to find out if the me macros misbehave
similarly elsewhere, or if this problem arose due to groff (either our fork of
me(7) or something within the typesetting logic itself).

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58736>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/