Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Yavor Doganov Newsgroups: gnu.gnustep.bug Subject: [bug #58546] GSTLS certificate expiration test always fails on 32-bit architectures Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 04:36:40 -0400 (EDT) Lines: 19 Approved: bug-gnustep@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20200611-200700.sv47215.80688@savannah.gnu.org> <20200612-081557.sv337.7002@savannah.gnu.org> <20200612-082946.sv431.63124@savannah.gnu.org> <20200612-083630.sv431.64373@savannah.gnu.org> <20200612-113640.sv47215.78756@savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1591951002 27417 209.51.188.17 (12 Jun 2020 08:36:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: Richard Frith-Macdonald , Fred Kiefer , Yavor Doganov , bug-gnustep@gnu.org Envelope-to: bug-gnustep@gnu.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1001:sendmail.php X-Savane-Server: savannah.gnu.org:443 [209.51.188.72] X-Savane-Project: gnustep X-Savane-Tracker: bugs X-Savane-Item-ID: 58546 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:77.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/77.0 X-Apparently-From: 46.10.101.102 (Savane authenticated user yavor) In-Reply-To: <20200612-083630.sv431.64373@savannah.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: bug-gnustep@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNUstep programming environment List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <20200612-113640.sv47215.78756@savannah.gnu.org> X-Mailman-Original-References: <20200611-200700.sv47215.80688@savannah.gnu.org> <20200612-081557.sv337.7002@savannah.gnu.org> <20200612-082946.sv431.63124@savannah.gnu.org> <20200612-083630.sv431.64373@savannah.gnu.org> Xref: csiph.com gnu.gnustep.bug:4386 Follow-up Comment #4, bug #58546 (project gnustep): AFAIK, the time_t limitation is on all 32 bit systems, at least glibc-based ones. IIRC, there were some discussions to address this issue but it turned out that such a change would break the ABI. Perhaps you mean *BSD systems or some Unix flavours? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/