Path: csiph.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Smith <null@void.com>
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help
Subject: Re: TCO with named-let via macros
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 06:36:56 +0100
Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID: <m1ttgxhkp3.fsf@void.com>
References: <m11q42e6zz.fsf@void.com> <8734oi5ksx.fsf@axel-reichert.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com; logging-data="15391"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Sfi8W5pE4qA1uiTlL1yWymxpvGI= sha1:ojyi8eF2M1+zTGIuVwucni8oWJk= sha256:3GJSqouVT2Lg/1csP92vwFQJIe2bf+q+RXUbtENeE1M= sha1:2cGC7muc9cxnJOz6MIeuXEMIYXE= sha256:xVTA4RmMzKirIYSjCnaKIPAsVLodOTw3Q9eDWb1l7jc=
Xref: csiph.com gnu.emacs.help:60984

Axel - I know that elisp doesn't optimise if an expressed recursive
function is tail-recursive.
A practical work-around is an alterative approach using the looping
built-in's like "dotimes" (?) - where a recursive approach would have
minimalistic beauty.
Regards, Rich S