Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.emacs.help > #60990
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 10 Aug 2024 19:56:32 +0000 |
| From | steve g <sgonedes1977@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.emacs.help |
| Subject | Re: TCO with named-let via macros |
| References | <m11q42e6zz.fsf@void.com> <8734oi5ksx.fsf@axel-reichert.de> <m1y169hl35.fsf@void.com> |
| Date | Sat, 10 Aug 2024 15:56:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <87ikw8jgnj.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:2FM2ZnUjBaeHgKnb3urDi2nRedI= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Lines | 83 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-Trace | sv3-AaLC3fkS7a41Wjxu9rCDJgkKXUDWwTTkh94JsyFhOy0912jFam71V2ciBQVvZ2/U2lCmZ4t5lE6/O/h!X+dgYxy9tmkaUkXLjCpbiUaCc6+jcI7QfmP0dPRS1iz2V30= |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@giganews.com |
| X-DMCA-Notifications | http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.emacs.help:60990 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Richard Smith <null@void.com> writes: > Thanks Axel > Regarding the second approach; > I have read > * Paul Graham's "On Lisp" > * Siebel's "Practical Common Lisp" > so have seen things like "gensym" and why has to be so. > > Reality is, with very not-advanced lisp basics I seem to do well. yeah me too :) > > In my world of melting and shaping metal, there seems to be something > good about the working environment of equations and explanations in one > document. It seems to facilitate a person developing their thoughts. I so agree! I thread and weld pipe for fire suppression systems. we use hydraulic calculations; if you can do this you are golden... > > This seems to be the biggest issue - what the environment makes readily > and enjoyably achievable. > > In recent years > > * every beam calculation I want to do > (Euler-Bernoulli beam - derived 1750's; applied eg. Eiffel 1880's-ish) > which I do use frequently in my welding and engineering work > > * a 1-D computer-numerical solution for heat-flow which proves a useful > "nutcracker" for considering what's going on where the issue is > conductive heat transfer Oh yeah! another heat transfer variable :) > > * in mineral processing (considering processing metal ores - tin, > copper, etc) I can run through calculations actually feeling very > happy > > Mineral processing was last new application, a couple of months ago. > I'm surrounded by abandoned mines here - some of the iconic images of > Cornwall. With for me the crucial thing being that tin-mining is > restarting here. There's also lithium here - efforts to work that. > None of these metals "self-extract" from the "run-of-mine" ore. > Hence mineral processing as an expertise. > > Thing is, those happily-done calculations enabled me to see the > twists-and-turns the author, with decades of experience of mineral > processing, could throw at you to get you to think through the issue. > Layers deeper than the text alone could take you. > I had to visualise the minerals and mineral streams, then draw sketches > which were my "model", my boss still uses graphing paper and HGC3 (hydrolic calculator v3). > then derive the maths (concurred with the > author's equations) - then write the elisp functions and get the > answers. > No immediate jobs so having to get back to welding - but could return to > remind of the logical path which worked for me, in those files, whenever. > > These were all "trivial" algebraic expressions, in computing terms. > > I appreciate you showing me > where I could take my computing > if that juncture came. > > Regards, > Rich Smith Thank you!
Back to gnu.emacs.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
thanks - calculate pi fn. in elisp Richard Smith <null@void.com> - 2024-07-09 19:48 +0100
TCO with named-let via macros (was: thanks - calculate pi fn. in elisp) Axel Reichert <mail@axel-reichert.de> - 2024-07-09 23:15 +0200
Re: TCO with named-let via macros Richard Smith <null@void.com> - 2024-07-10 06:28 +0100
Re: TCO with named-let via macros steve g <sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2024-08-10 15:56 -0400
Re: TCO with named-let via macros Richard Smith <null@void.com> - 2024-08-10 22:28 +0100
Re: TCO with named-let via macros Richard Smith <null@void.com> - 2024-07-10 06:36 +0100
Re: TCO with named-let via macros steve g <sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2024-08-10 16:22 -0400
Re: TCO with named-let via macros Axel Reichert <mail@axel-reichert.de> - 2024-08-10 23:15 +0200
Re: TCO with named-let via macros steve g <sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2024-08-11 14:56 -0400
Re: TCO with named-let via macros Richard Smith <null@void.com> - 2025-04-08 10:26 +0100
Re: TCO with named-let via macros Richard Smith <null@void.com> - 2024-07-10 06:59 +0100
Re: TCO with named-let via macros Richard Smith <null@void.com> - 2024-07-10 09:18 +0100
Re: TCO with named-let via macros steve g <sgonedes1977@gmail.com> - 2024-08-10 16:26 -0400
Re: TCO with named-let via macros Richard Smith <null@void.com> - 2024-08-10 22:51 +0100
csiph-web