Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jonathan Lamothe Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Subject: Problems signing PGP mail with emacs Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 22:36:31 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <877bq159ao.fsf@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Injection-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c80499981218215b9cbc36becb3369ff"; logging-data="1258022"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QpuSz7//Ep3vRVrDWwKTNMBmXyFyY5qw=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:nS6VgE9qLQWA4L445AGwFZaGp4U= sha1:NHi53ADhkzMRYq6WtW8+f//C+Gw= Xref: csiph.com gnu.emacs.help:61061 So, it seeks I'm having trouble signing pgpmime mail in emacs. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I definitely have EasyPGP configured correctly, as evidenced by my ability to sign this in-line section. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEnPLOA+vwjoyLZsNmAZhGPjzz/9EFAmnm3tsACgkQAZhGPjzz /9GCwBAA4FrwlkqiiYkFIoCfbRiJqroDqsUJHGcqY5WCIL82Xc6YqyM0e4hhOMHN utNetXII7sRL35JhwKeTZ5XdgnFl2DJw3RqulRpqWnzoH1CfKdoMzZ8nXENdtNxx OPR6EWWO5s4m0qQVU0z/FpD5ilsKN680fFow6hDbkmAAyf/vNgqVK14CabXu5YlT /rHFYvtEqTDQzuSieDT3dYnolBcQR1xOqeVfrI5AwCJJ5uCb/phNqrZj2xwgaj5g QQrBla/z45bhrX2+VupVhHN19W6pqT4kF/V9rWNi92mf0/JkZcSyc38szc1xTqkg aBb15FXVfe/zST9/EGCVuuoY+7/3e7g6uBDhO9D+cib+rh0EGXSxoReuUJavBgkY GCX66MFXrMN8VvzaehcKgaZSILzq3u4scfypmBEl5FKKbR6NyOH8bli/JqvanL6r tlqYhYIqfqlwMgV9RjqopjbDqo7OV16wF+sdgVxlQgeC8PLjVTn+jMSePwDx5pm9 7CjKJqMaorr+vc8sAfIZDOHz9Tg2lSdmDll9kbWhXPxhoKu8z0dMKNdtmnR/wSGs ThhYpKaI1E9D81JMv686zkGKOaPNzfzF8R5GG0C4IxsGUmTocUKmHgIugcaXv+pY LEoKTX5safB6pwHjkMdK7WwloUgS1+alOuMSvExEbGipejKIVcU= =iniD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ...but when I do a `C-c C-M S p' to sign the message and send with `C-c C-c', I get: message-encode-message-body: Wrong type argument: consp, nil The weird thing is that I'm sure I had this working about a week ago. I don't know what changed. -- Regards, Jonathan Lamothe https://jlamothe.net