Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14864 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-29 09:02 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-11-29 09:02 -0800 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Optimisation request Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:02 -0800
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 09:02 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Optimisation request |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4869.1543510965.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> |
On 11/26/18 1:29 PM, Martijn Dekker wrote: > I've noticed bash-5.0beta is quite a bit faster than bash-4.4 in running a > lot of pure shell code. Good news. > > One optimisation that isn't done yet: if a subshell function like > > f() (foo) > > is used in a command substitution, it forks twice. I would like it if it > could be optimised to eliminate the fork if the subshell function is the > last command in the command substitution. There is already code to optimize subshell commands like this; it's just disabled until bash-5.1 so I have more time to test it. Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug
csiph-web