Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11877 > unrolled thread

Re: Possible bug in getopts when required argument is not supplied

Started by"Griff Miller II" <griff.miller@oplink.net>
First post2015-11-13 13:54 -0600
Last post2015-11-13 13:54 -0600
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to gnu.bash.bug

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Possible bug in getopts when required argument is not supplied "Griff Miller II" <griff.miller@oplink.net> - 2015-11-13 13:54 -0600

#11877 — Re: Possible bug in getopts when required argument is not supplied

From"Griff Miller II" <griff.miller@oplink.net>
Date2015-11-13 13:54 -0600
SubjectRe: Possible bug in getopts when required argument is not supplied
Message-ID<mailman.2284.1447444490.7904.bug-bash@gnu.org>
On Fri, November 13, 2015 1:02 pm, Dennis Williamson wrote:
> Your opts string needs to begin with a colon to enable silent error
> reporting and you need to handle the colon in your case statement as the
> condition where a required argument is missing.

Hi, Dennis - thanks for replying. I get the same behavior with silent
reporting. My real script where I discovered this behavior actually uses
silent reporting - I didn't use it in my example to keep things simple.

> Snippets:
>
>
> opts=:a:b:c
>
>
> :) echo "Missing argument for option -$OPTARG" >&2;;
>
>
> You should escape the question mark since otherwise it's a globbing
> character:

You are right! I missed that when throwing together my example script.

> \?) echo "Unknown option: -$OPTARG" >&2; exit 1;;
>
>
> --
> Visit serverfault.com to get your system administration questions
> answered.
>


[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | gnu.bash.bug


csiph-web