Path: csiph.com!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 04:32:30 -0700
Lines: 10
Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID: <mailman.857.1569238398.2190.bug-bash@gnu.org>
References: <20180310075024.196515-1-dancol@google.com> <CAKOZuesyQ81O_GfkOZsPiBhgTVWzfCjXvV4G+52GoiEnSENTiw@mail.gmail.com> <b3595753-add3-40aa-8362-f683b05fdba7@case.edu> <CAKOZueukmT5skB_uxD3jSoK1w8L2SQhAwpFHC4Wgnj4h-Dczgg@mail.gmail.com> <9dd461f8-9a65-10c7-f21d-e274446cc411@case.edu> <CAKOZueuTpWvrpi2w2k+3U+BxD0k5H5baNbNgh_U3UosHE+gP=Q@mail.gmail.com> <c44dfb06-fad2-4b6c-0520-558cec6d25ba@case.edu> <CAKOZueuJZkPzJwRH56FwWtDDdNxxa+Zm=VZDhnJuTf5bfo2Y2w@mail.gmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1569238400 21519 209.51.188.17 (23 Sep 2019 11:33:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc: "bash.bug list" <bug-bash@gnu.org>
To: Chester Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yLFiq1YTBgOWzLESfcTFtvJ2xJxyGEkktQrF02CRLug=; b=FyA+8wnf7Riw2+uMtdE0JK/CaBjpJWR8JZguvjPbWqZoj8WRuKiRBemf8dYq/PAmoQ Nx4DDy/0eDFm2KixX9JA9utiD7W7D3Pgs6wFoBpkqTatBTALd2b16/2L/7AEeq7Lqlmw +S2MYjv8tbBXRXvhZysIro1IC7l55B1zrmr4XPyZHATFHaT0WAzwMSr641Hm2q7kAcRy /okirCW1YvevPxLdsmYkP2txULop3zSd6Jx2Yn57c94FohnZzrgP0WRJ36txqurroF61 blIUImz8D/nBzFhkw6y8OWdWunJFltPTAKg8t8hJ2+1EUyobxeMgg2zgGOU74PVXE+zd IJbg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yLFiq1YTBgOWzLESfcTFtvJ2xJxyGEkktQrF02CRLug=; b=DeTPSTbzoiXfr3VnL/z+oiowjvD4VOO5h3CRB5wM3JSDNWdjEv4/9TR9b286fhVrGZ +YdrfZzB2OIhpUQaO9EXSaqw5zITNpgk9kvhcpNwTy3pRF7M8HvJf9PN43NqGkG0HUSR +vBRby9llQNe3Oh3Q6ZUCMHnEQ9+S3YzaD0mONlJZCJ11nPIWiRur5IqErvlUGeQtUvY M0oZ1PoTfKWTKWAvZ/c8QOPVR51to5daC1d4yaoLWpLa4eDkihIFSPQyMphrIo08VV2N lyq9esGZwAy29FmrkNAbS4x6Mg8JbjysHgb+g9Xfm9mn070faaWsxnFiFc954BrJdh4Q PN+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWAMZNlqM6dQhwHZHSHpXBkj90IbeYn8WIFpsXn1Yg4dB5WaRHb Etj2OToYNx+Hk83mM3iHZWyKFLIgNpGtRIrBKOYC1g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy9CLGjmc+T7fK9a0ZSaCZkzxNWECodqlktBi9c2mBrjoQLDVeuTth1wxi205kTPCitq69oF0uUmZUi/qLA71s=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:915:: with SMTP id w21mr15941254uag.30.1569238386468; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 04:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <c44dfb06-fad2-4b6c-0520-558cec6d25ba@case.edu>
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized.
X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::941
X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <CAKOZueuJZkPzJwRH56FwWtDDdNxxa+Zm=VZDhnJuTf5bfo2Y2w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References: <20180310075024.196515-1-dancol@google.com> <CAKOZuesyQ81O_GfkOZsPiBhgTVWzfCjXvV4G+52GoiEnSENTiw@mail.gmail.com> <b3595753-add3-40aa-8362-f683b05fdba7@case.edu> <CAKOZueukmT5skB_uxD3jSoK1w8L2SQhAwpFHC4Wgnj4h-Dczgg@mail.gmail.com> <9dd461f8-9a65-10c7-f21d-e274446cc411@case.edu> <CAKOZueuTpWvrpi2w2k+3U+BxD0k5H5baNbNgh_U3UosHE+gP=Q@mail.gmail.com> <c44dfb06-fad2-4b6c-0520-558cec6d25ba@case.edu>
Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:15408

On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 12:37 PM Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:
>
> On 1/9/19 2:39 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> > Any chance we can revive this patch now that Bash 5 is out? (The patch
> > itself, of course, would need to be rebased.)
>
> Yes, I plan to.

Have you had a chance to look at the patch?