Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11357
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Linda Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | remaking bash, trying static, glibc refuses static...? |
| Date | Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:54:58 -0700 |
| Lines | 31 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8444.1439762110.904.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1439762110 22364 208.118.235.17 (16 Aug 2015 21:55:10 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| To | bug-bash <bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| User-Agent | Thunderbird |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] |
| X-Received-From | 173.164.175.65 |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.14 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:11357 |
Show key headers only | View raw
bash-4.3/lib/readline/complete.c:2193: warning: Using 'getpwent' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking Other syms: getpwnam, setpwent, endpwent. Is providing a static lib that reads the local machine's /etc/passwd file really beyond the capabilities of the glibc people? The configure comment says one would build bash static for 'miniroot operations by 'root' (formatting other partitions, restoring, etc...). I don't really see why dynamic libs are needed at a time that no other file systems may be mounted -- operating in like "run level 1 (single user). This has a political feel to it (only because I can't imagine any techncial reason to not provide it). Does anyone else ever try a static link on bash? My 'bash' is 'bigger than most distro bashes (1.2M), but everything but the libc stuff is builtin (all the builtins & help files -- given that's all in there, 1.2M doesn't seem that large these days > ldd /bin/bash linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffd09d86000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003001400000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003000c00000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0000003004000000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00005612dbf11000)
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
remaking bash, trying static, glibc refuses static...? Linda Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> - 2015-08-16 14:54 -0700
csiph-web