Path: csiph.com!au2pb.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!news.ripco.com!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Linda Walsh Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: why is 'direxpand' converting relative paths to absolute? Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:54:45 -0700 Lines: 38 Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <55CD1B61.8030405@tlinx.org> <87bneaxrvu.fsf@igel.home> <55D0DA32.8090405@tlinx.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1439762098 22359 208.118.235.17 (16 Aug 2015 21:54:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: bug-bash Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org User-Agent: Thunderbird In-Reply-To: <55D0DA32.8090405@tlinx.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Received-From: 173.164.175.65 X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:11356 >From the manpage I wouldn't have guess it changed paths to absolute -- but would expand variables and wildcards in the path. It doesn't seem to make alot of sense when there are other ways to go from rel->abs, but not so many that just expand vars or aliases on a dir. Does anyone know why path conversion was built into it? Linda Walsh wrote: > > > Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Linda Walsh writes: >> >>> in bash 4.3.39, >>> if I type a command, (like "."(source)) and a relative path >>> like : ../conf, >>> it expands the relative pathname to absolute pathnames. >> >> Worksforme. Make sure to run complete -r first. > --- > You didn't say what version of bash you were using... but > that may not be relative: > > It seems to be "direxpand" -- do you have it on or off. > > It is supposed to perform word expansion. It doesn't > say it will convert relative paths to absolute. > > Has it always been that way? (I thought direxpand expanded > variables in a path?) > >