Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Greg Wooledge Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: Feature Request re: syslog and bashhist Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:06:52 -0400 Lines: 8 Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <55C78FC8.1050609@gmail.com> <55C9073C.3030203@case.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1439384848 9404 208.118.235.17 (12 Aug 2015 13:07:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu Cc: "bug-bash@gnu.org" To: John McKown Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 139.137.100.1 X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:11328 On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 08:00:24AM -0500, John McKown wrote: > Case 2: I'm running bash on my employer's system???. Do I really have an > expectation of privacy on my employer's system? Why would I? In some countries, yes, there is such an expectation. Logging your employees' activities may or may not be legal in any specific jurisdiction. Consult a lawyer for details.