Path: csiph.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Alexandrov Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?4oCYY29tbWFuZCDigKYgJuKAmQ==?= creates subshell Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 18:29:46 +0300 Lines: 32 Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <7dvoi92p.dag@gnui.org> <09ea84b2-4fb1-6b05-7c0b-fe6b2ab00c6f@archlinux.org> <2643.1593599092@jinx.noi.kre.to> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1593617396 5436 209.51.188.17 (1 Jul 2020 15:29:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu Cc: Eli Schwartz , bug-bash@gnu.org To: Robert Elz Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org X-EA-Auth: xcIoJtjIp0BUvxSNIOLmpoiEo4oaVmkoBmFlPPAbOS1gmc94JQq0lS/acWZf2AaIjqBLi9PiMC5SyGJGe8oQpDh1sgAqRS/H In-Reply-To: <2643.1593599092@jinx.noi.kre.to> (Robert Elz's message of "Wed, 01 Jul 2020 17:24:52 +0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) OpenPGP: id=525F7E60AD812C2361752BB4C8B0F8548EE7F3E7; url=https://openpgpkey.gnui.org/.well-known/openpgpkey/gnui.org/hu/hr4k5tkxm6shwdc18su4bkm34w3dctjd Mail-Copies-To: always Received-SPF: pass client-ip=213.182.54.5; envelope-from=dag@gnui.org; helo=relay-2.mailobj.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/01 11:29:49 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: <7dvoi92p.dag@gnui.org> <09ea84b2-4fb1-6b05-7c0b-fe6b2ab00c6f@archlinux.org> <2643.1593599092@jinx.noi.kre.to> Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16510 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert Elz wrote: > | > If you need to ensure a disk executable is used, > | Of course. Why "command" otherwise? > > That doesn't actually work, "command" can run built-ins Ah, yes, thanks for correction. > there is actually no method =E2=80=B9=E2=80=A6=E2=80=BA which guarantees = execution of an executable from an external file, other than by using the c= omplete path name Well, I am not sure whether it=CA=BCs guaranteed, but the =E2=80=98exec=E2= =80=99 as above does execute an external command in GNU Bash. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYIACsWIQRSX35grYEsI2F1K7TIsPhUjufz5wUCXvyr6g0cZGFnQGdudWku b3JnAAoJEMiw+FSO5/PnwjgBAM7fEPypsc5K94PxJo3RWC4nulfI3YTPRkcBm4Gl 32UtAQCvuy/cvwVnK4Ke8H7F7YsPNfvBq230U2IOcDChaCixCA== =0JLx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--