Path: csiph.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Martin Schulte Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Output of jobs wrong Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 20:48:00 +0200 Lines: 43 Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20190921204800.c3c911d32e3b955b7901b887@schrader-schulte.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1569091685 25965 209.51.188.17 (21 Sep 2019 18:48:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: bug-bash@gnu.org Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 91.184.37.130 X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <20190921204800.c3c911d32e3b955b7901b887@schrader-schulte.de> Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:15394 Hello, I'm not feeling well writing this mail because so far I've not been able to reproduce the behaviour I describe in the following... I was trying to understand the "[Patch] (tiny problem) bad short_doc for % command" thread when I entered more or less the following sequence of commands: $ help -s % %: job_spec [&] $ sleep 10 ^C [Interrupted with CTRL-C - maybe "exactly" after 10 seconds] $ sleep 100 & $ sleep 200 & $ sleep 30 & $ % ^C [Interrupted with CTRL-C] $ sleep 300 & $ jobs [1] Running sleep 10 & [2]- Running sleep 10 & [3]+ Running sleep 300 & So job 1 and job 2 listed the wrong argument. I checked this from a second terminal with 'ps -lf' - and there were three sleep with arguments 100, 200 and 300... Systeminfo: $ uname -a Linux martnix4 4.9.0-9-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.168-1+deb9u5 (2019-08-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux $ echo $BASH_VERSION 4.4.12(1)-release Sorry, I would like to be more helpful - but maybe someone else has noticed a similiar problem or has an idea with the sources in mind. Best regards, Martin