Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14961

Re: write() not retried after EINTR in printf and echo

Path csiph.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: write() not retried after EINTR in printf and echo
Date Wed, 26 Dec 2018 12:22:02 -0500
Organization ITS, Case Western Reserve University
Lines 37
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.6321.1545844932.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <CAFra36hm9XcAgwqr7Yp_giX+kiSEp__x4Mc5Qn=eqgUdSdLA7Q@mail.gmail.com> <eefa8e88-104a-1fd3-b505-a279778ba291@case.edu> <CAFra36izjDTTFBsRfzsgCr8YGk+n=7O=FiMVX=ivuh5Ejw5MAQ@mail.gmail.com> <996dc3ea-0718-481b-3dc7-4fd358a3a64e@case.edu> <CAFra36gB3JM3R+RWF8JGOE7PEX2D0nvoCKJqWJBxypa0TGHiRg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To chet.ramey@case.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1545844933 13962 208.118.235.17 (26 Dec 2018 17:22:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc chet.ramey@case.edu, bug-bash <bug-bash@gnu.org>
To Bize Ma <binaryzebra@gmail.com>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:cc:subject:to:references:from:openpgp :autocrypt:organization:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=So1yfwAuyeZuu4o77ZT/hd92ACK+dadSkAMlyq0QkDo=; b=kvBNRfgiGY0Je7Ce4e2prAi3SnQEPnrSGNkd5ZtpJNvQ8Meaa077sAnGtAlkO1sXhf gsq4DObQ2VloOI90ep4/pl4eoaFivS70XsFVxX0QaDPh9GUbRwagLfuFLSqFbNpVhmpf XrvfNYg9z6iXK7pu8Bh/+bVVazOwjhpyklS2/LQX/aBgX/EYYLBYDB6VzpHdXaNL4FaB K59Y2+DoJLCfTCbh7qnVMPdzI+iaDI6YxktVEI/94+IYSN/Qu5d9ZW5EOHlQ/LiO0RYF BIOzFl5/3P9oWNwsGv/fmmTANCxkiC+yEuM00SJEzhd+9yBki5z4hkuAx2/K1/2mF+py 6H4g==
X-Gm-Message-State AA+aEWafq96g2/q0ccQa8ByA5/FoGjmzrNMdei/o8mnbkCYn0wFZefav AnsMpijfFhzqoPaFuC6Gh9DnFYCvQ+6qN4PVtbdfprwcxJcUtT1VjgvIFoZlOyIbB0aeiov5KGQ A/GZ2Gi+2aIw=
X-Received by 2002:a81:2548:: with SMTP id l69mr20474400ywl.397.1545844924630; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 09:22:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source AFSGD/UUuzYBuBWxp1B9bSkKtyfFa5muOeCmWBbnKiVCwf+sges/qc34/iRIBUneWmrxBVfmBSwuWg==
X-Received by 2002:a81:2548:: with SMTP id l69mr20474389ywl.397.1545844924411; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 09:22:04 -0800 (PST)
Openpgp preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt addr=chet.ramey@case.edu; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsDiBEEOsGwRBACFa0A1oa71HSZLWxAx0svXzhOZNQZOzqHmSuGOG92jIpQpr8DpvgRh40Yp AwdcXb8QG1J5yGAKeevNE1zCFaA725vGSdHUyypHouV0xoWwukYO6qlyyX+2BZU+okBUqoWQ koWxiYaCSfzB2Ln7pmdys1fJhcgBKf3VjWCjd2XJTwCgoFJOwyBFJdugjfwjSoRSwDOIMf0D /iQKqlWhIO1LGpMrGX0il0/x4zj0NAcSwAk7LaPZbN4UPjn5pqGEHBlf1+xDDQCkAoZ/VqES GZragl4VqJfxBr29Ag0UDvNbUbXoxQsARdero1M8GiAIRc50hj7HXFoERwenbNDJL86GPLAQ OTGOCa4W2o29nFfFjQrsrrYHzVtyA/9oyKvTeEMJ7NA3VJdWcmn7gOu0FxEmSNhSoV1T4vP2 1Wf7f5niCCRKQLNyUy0wEApQi4tSysdz+AbgAc0b/bHYVzIf2uO2lIEZQNNt+3g2bmXgloWm W5fsm/di50Gm1l1Na63d3RZ00SeFQos6WEwLUHEB0yp6KXluXLLIZitEJM0aQ2hldCBSYW1l eSA8Y2hldEBjd3J1LmVkdT7CYQQTEQIAIQIbAwYLCQgHAwIDFQIDAxYCAQIeAQIXgAUCQ+La kQIZAQAKCRC7WGnwZOp0q9rGAJ4sRGLmlF8klZTH75z7jyQScpU6aACeNMahjWIhumt4u96d 9mdMJqlabVnOwE0EQQ6wbxAEAJCukwDigRDPhAuI+lf+6P64lWanIFOXIndqhvU13cDbQ/Wt 5LwPzm2QTvd7F+fcHOgZ8KOFScbDpjJaRqwIybMTcIN0B2pBLX/C10W1aY+cUrXZgXUGVISE MmpaP9v02auToo7XXVEHC+XLO9IU7/xaU98FL69l6/K4xeNSBRM/AAMHA/wNAmRBpcyK0+Vg gZ5esQaIP/LyolAm2qwcmrd3dZi+g24s7yjV0EUwvRP7xHRDQFgkAo6++QbuecU/J90lxrVn QwucZmfz9zgWDkT/MpfB/CNRSKLFjhYq2yHmHWT6vEjw9Ry/hF6Pc0oh1a62USdfaKAiim0n VxxQmPmiRvtCmcJJBBgRAgAJBQJBDrBvAhsMAAoJELtYafBk6nSr43AAn2ZZFQg8Gs/zUzvX Mt7evaFqVTzcAJ0cHtKpP1i/4H4R9+OsYeQdxxWxTQ==
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
In-Reply-To <CAFra36gB3JM3R+RWF8JGOE7PEX2D0nvoCKJqWJBxypa0TGHiRg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language en-US
X-Junkmail-Status score=8/90, host=mpv4-2015.case.edu
X-Junkmail-PrAS-Raw score=8/90, refid=2.7.2:2018.12.26.162716:17:8.317, ip=, rules=__YOUTUBE_RCVD, __X_GOOGLE_DKIM_SIGNATURE, __HAS_REPLYTO, __HAS_CC_HDR, __MULTIPLE_RCPTS_CC_X2, __CC_NAME, __CC_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC, __SUBJ_REPLY, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NAME, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC, __REFERENCES, __HAS_FROM, FROM_EDU_TLD, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, DATE_TZ_NA, __USER_AGENT, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT, __MIME_VERSION, __IN_REP_TO, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ADDY, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ACC, __FROM_DOMAIN_IN_ANY_CC2, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_DOMAIN, __ANY_URI, __HTTPS_URI, __URI_WITH_PATH, __URI_NO_WWW, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __MULTIPLE_URI_TEXT, __URI_IN_BODY, __URI_NOT_IMG, __FORWARDED_MSG, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW, BODY_SIZE_1300_1399, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_P1, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, [TRUNCATED], so=2010-03-03 19:42:08, dmn=2016-08-03-0138
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] [fuzzy]
X-Received-From 129.22.103.195
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:14961

Show key headers only | View raw


On 12/25/18 3:01 PM, Bize Ma wrote:

> No, that is not the intent. I merely failed to correctly convey the
> perception that others have of your code:
> 
> https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/487260/265604

That is, of course, their privilege.

> And, having failed, I am trying again.
> 
> But, probably, I should just not inform you of what others think given your
> upfront rejection to any (constructive) criticism.

The thing is, these are not new discussions. They've taken place multiple
times over the years.

>     There's a case to be made for doing
>     that, I suppose, but I'd rather defer to the system's default handling
>     for a particular signal.
> 
> 
> Do as you wish, we will still be able to form our own opinion about buggy
> code.

There's nothing wrong with people disagreeing in good faith.

Even better, you can take the code itself and make what you feel are the
necessary changes, then try them out in a real-world scenario. If you
feel that read and write should never be interrupted by a caught signal,
it should be easy enough to experiment with and verify.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: write() not retried after EINTR in printf and echo Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-12-26 12:22 -0500

csiph-web