Path: csiph.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Ilkka Virta Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: Incorrect example for `[[` command. Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:30:17 +0300 Lines: 24 Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20190920124827.GP28751@eeg.ccf.org> <70f5667e-d91e-a4cf-fef0-b72c7d61a29a@iki.fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1568986235 21754 209.51.188.17 (20 Sep 2019 13:30:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: bug-bash@gnu.org Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 In-Reply-To: <20190920124827.GP28751@eeg.ccf.org> Content-Language: en-US X-SASI-RCODE: 200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iki.fi; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtp; bh=6HAwsgahMZkTM47RKeXOopOg7EVeaIC1NE5YxYBImdo=; b=PHuL3V26khmf1aQRCKDxb/husppsG+Qs8idVKgsVTFomoj+/8lgQZdFQ0M5r8614c/m6sh5rh6b7m6LLxyvByCk7wLie2OlsCKyC0rApVWJ35ePTd5jG3E+7tn4eUi9tWSvXaPwoH3Ws+U6NJ02lDhOLyD/QN4jXVco3aqwgNpX9ZzYm4+OLk8xWyQfSEXzpU+MA7TxfLphOCFtsms7zXr+ZFr0QTRKmiaRe+YqDb9rJB24OE81jKJeGOmKIIJ1PEQHon/96myhZBixGWquyaq9+n11gsBQ+e3X+/+EJd6bZqU+isvyGe5Zorg7vRK/zKO7+ofwtNbnjoY+K3WFpLA== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 8.x X-Received-From: 157.24.2.213 X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <70f5667e-d91e-a4cf-fef0-b72c7d61a29a@iki.fi> X-Mailman-Original-References: <20190920124827.GP28751@eeg.ccf.org> Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:15382 On 20.9. 15:48, Greg Wooledge wrote: > but after the regex-glob-thing, it says: >=20 > That means values like =E2=80=98aab=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98 aaaaaab=E2= =80=99 will match >=20 > So there's a shift in intent between a? and a+ in what's supposed to be > a regular expression. Although of course the sentence is *literally* > true because the regex would be unanchored, and therefore it's sufficie= nt > to match only the 'ab', and the rest of the input doesn't matter. > But that's just confusing, and doesn't belong in this kind of document. It goes on to say "as will a line containing a 'b' anywhere in its=20 value", so the text does recognize the zero-width-matching parts don't=20 affect what matches. (I suppose they would affect what goes to=20 BASH_REMATCH[0], but the text doesn't mention that.) I think it would be a better example with the anchored version also=20 presented for comparison. --=20 Ilkka Virta / itvirta@iki.fi