Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Greg Wooledge Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: Unexpected delay in using arguments. Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 09:37:06 -0400 Lines: 7 Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1534167434 16908 208.118.235.17 (13 Aug 2018 13:37:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu Cc: Chet Ramey , bug-bash To: Bize Ma Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: Bize Ma , Chet Ramey , bug-bash Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 139.137.100.1 X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:14472 On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 03:16:34AM -0400, Bize Ma wrote: > Which is a thousand times slower. > Bash 5 is even worse Pre-release bash sources use a debugging-friendly (slow) malloc. Or something. Damn, google is not helping me out here.