Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14864
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Optimisation request |
| Date | 2018-11-29 09:02 -0800 |
| Organization | ITS, Case Western Reserve University |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4869.1543510965.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <76d7e217-41db-b300-f2b5-5686918177a4@inlv.org> |
On 11/26/18 1:29 PM, Martijn Dekker wrote: > I've noticed bash-5.0beta is quite a bit faster than bash-4.4 in running a > lot of pure shell code. Good news. > > One optimisation that isn't done yet: if a subshell function like > > f() (foo) > > is used in a command substitution, it forks twice. I would like it if it > could be optimised to eliminate the fork if the subshell function is the > last command in the command substitution. There is already code to optimize subshell commands like this; it's just disabled until bash-5.1 so I have more time to test it. Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Optimisation request Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:02 -0800
csiph-web