Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel?= <angel@16bits.net>
Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 02:41:47 +0200
Lines: 43
Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID: <mailman.364.1586997714.3066.bug-bash@gnu.org>
References: <M4dFweU--3-2@tutanota.com> <875c423e-0420-78d2-af4b-dfb168432e2d@case.edu> <M4dz8wC--3-2@tutanota.com> <1586997707.1070.15.camel@16bits.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1586997715 12038 209.51.188.17 (16 Apr 2020 00:41:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu
To: bug-bash@gnu.org
Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <M4dz8wC--3-2@tutanota.com>
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy]
X-Received-From: 199.195.249.9
X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <1586997707.1070.15.camel@16bits.net>
X-Mailman-Original-References: <M4dFweU--3-2@tutanota.com> <875c423e-0420-78d2-af4b-dfb168432e2d@case.edu> <M4dz8wC--3-2@tutanota.com>
Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16143

On 2020-04-11 at 18:04 +0200, gentoo_eshoes wrote:
> $ echo ${PS1@A}
> declare -x PS1=3D$'\\\n-----------\\n\\\n\\[\\a\\]\\\n\\[\\e[1;37m\
> \e[42m\\]\\u@\\H\\[\\e[0m\\] \\\n\\[\\033[1;30m\\]$(date "+%Y/%m/%d %
> H:%M:%S")\\[\\033[0m\\] \\\n\\[\\e[0;37m\\]\\s\\V t:\\l j:\\j \\\nd:
> ${SHLVL} pp:${PPID} p:$$ ut`cat /proc/uptime | cut -f1 -d.`\\[\\e[0m\
> \]\\n\\\n\\[\\e[0;37m\\]!\\!\\[\\e[0m\\] \\\n\\[\\033[0;36m\\]\\#\\[\
> \033[0m\\] \\\n$(evalexitcode "${__earlyec[@]}" ) \\\n\\[\\e[0m\
> \]$(uname -r) $(uname -v)\n$(ps_lepath "\\w")\\[ \\033];\\w\\a\\]\n\
> \[\\e[1;32m\\]\\$\\[\\e[0m\\] \\\n'


That was an=E2=80=A6 'interesting' prompt.

Note that there are several subprocesses that you could easily avoid:

$(date "+%Y/%m/%d %H:%M:%S") is equivalent to \D{%Y/%m/%d %H:%M:%S}


`cat /proc/uptime | cut -f1 -d.`  this could be simplified to `cut -f1 -d. =
/proc/uptime`
it may be replaced with just builtins by `uptime=3D$(</proc/uptime); builti=
n echo ${uptime/.*}`

$(uname -r) $(uname -v)  is equivalent to $(uname -r -v)  I wonder why you =
need these fairly static values on every prompt line, though.

$(ps_lepath "\\w")  is expanding \w which is actually summarizing $HOME
into a ~. So you end up calculating a lepath which is equivalent to
$PWD. In fact, you are then discarding the calculated var, and using
directly $PWD. So any call to ps_lepath is actually equivalent to printf
%q "$PWD"


Seems $PIPESTATUS does not change inside the $PS1 ($? does vary after
you launch those process substitutions), so you could just replace
evalexitcode "${__earlyec[@]}" with evalexitcode "${PIPESTATUS[@]}" and
get rid of the PROMPT_COMMAND, unless I'm missing some interaction.


Kind regards