Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: "M. Nejat AYDIN" Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: Assignment-like word shouldn't be subjected to tilde expansion in POSIX mode Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:36:36 +0300 Lines: 13 Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <8ddc4816-f85e-97b3-5c51-9b55acdcaca5@case.edu> <9881b6b4-237f-ea61-d9fc-9c3f9f9ae4c3@yahoo.com> <20200721114844.GQ22833@eeg.ccf.org> <5098cfe1-6de1-b22d-d8e9-a26ba0b3b991@yahoo.com> <20200721123005.GS22833@eeg.ccf.org> <0f088c7c-ce5d-cf25-cfcf-150cd16122b0@yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1595338610 28253 209.51.188.17 (21 Jul 2020 13:36:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: bug-bash@gnu.org Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1595338603; bh=mp3u6w/9xsPBGueu0q/DtxwBQ5ccVXUIlmJaucjMF4M=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=D3IHilQrqZFKauZ5OQgXiAxJQoM0g4FVuyzYnOHb8fGGSvVTfi9ji16yAeQOgilbr+lP0ZVGHI3/Cv2q4675dfuhoyhKbUzSq91IqXcReivS0I+m9EcH/aSJAXBOWsPOYuLeTFQSbrjWT9kVcminrjtuwut4Pb6935ItXoXz5dQkF+X3lnabDa+gxZAEGYyqHTYw1Wsn/d1Nf/KqMzX5RlK1K6UQwkwaXs2q0Lzdhk3LgTvJtxOhJdzleY8fgEZwNtFQ+2O+UeRx6/fSjLkEsnOvdeNtOMHZb/0uoaBjKIJHxVOfywAA5RGDNwlQsuZyqQMQ2hkpnnTxcHDkBVwQ2Q== X-YMail-OSG: pF7WFQoVM1nKdJGaM.yrI.1ZIsA2h.lIezTl88HJfVaWI3wqVhIThyuj0vGKBtc J2JfUqX40hs263CvsX6ZXh6Jkctb.sDNVODzGUC3Hsfg_aHHxLRiLWUwDE2fbNTKGc1BaLaxLIvv D8Q4YIx.G6W.YMq1wtwq7wJO_knStfFEIPUdkwvC1yplyWX8T__fIcKtR07EkMsyZVahnEFR40uV Rb.Ne7GyT6fW6jDqyWc3eZ..a37ZYPShMQS1mRbbFbG0v32G4oo33rUzbByHQQokfCE1GXZ8Npr7 m69A_aq4RmqVipqioCBqUI9hTGPLzM6DzkSpMNf.42j5onQhtyZofSFuTpYN_FV1zjAWc9O0EcNS OrrO9oX4cyLWMzN7wdYslGp3xzvu6FFOVxCCuqfsAQ3DaffLjFsWpl7s.WemgM6iDzuCkNSPoHyS ETGWgnLRMmviOkj1mn9aaW4_gR__tOejdlZ4ra0Fd8Oi1urTEPioZKLKqHPB2hwqgq7Pbt40DfXM QMRLeTtasFSHQZbxQrznsyddbGPk08g6pidUaVroa02gNgg3z3lQbypMblSz5K4_ThD8uUR3A.ET YovKc3Ufs.8RbGcB.rzkZ8zuLbc5SIrYCNb6ZXCUii7UFb3WnPMBhd2Wz8s7KndH8gI_xe.mdh6G Ni.a_RkTo7CP56uMSFhh5_p.2gyb1BPGYIRWcdutb7oxrH4YHdl5UFnaobl_QQsyft3QBPEoBZKM 1iWFkjFozZa0NM.xwLGiexpot0DheDjBAJFhsey2oDSAwLVah8mcR9wweTWT2zKjNKVzyk8BwQ.r iMgRHgavsRJrUs9ZX9BIMArdINjutLuUdg_Y9.EY31.EHgZqq4D4nRB8z4WDo5VSCvnpS0hoN8qv Fu6aJpbGr8_D92wjTKQnAPgb0c6LNIcCOUhIO8Jjt9tdzLGUV.SIObLqKFySX4.8qaLegwGDBsZs FBa.Snr2WjWLPO6Nx4MPG8Qw48z.6afQ6HQ.tN9p9rBtvXtfUNMPp1aRdK_UtXs2hSuIwm1WBTDb 4LcXGcyu_Luq9fpiVMqjFsdYu.yBpyC2yePxC2UsFSY.XXTgCb3xNQVzrQKEXrpqqBui0yJmtkPb hBT9bzi.UYrKYtJ6EQCHXX_GPS5B4Y3ZXNnZPONe82eIsY3MDJGWh0dGTlclhHqWj.itRDVsIaki b6D6wMSzhEPAwUMSLYhCxzp68zuJTZCVImsxm20pap6vOrKitX8eDrBmzttm17tU6lzxQdTaW2LD 16Lfv7ZahQweDqa2efI71UsA9hZ61U3e7Fah._iDrzCZXehL.IFjHG_gPIDpi0GPAnciBMn1oBGx cwBUaGCzMvuT1WBnpPj6otjEzijF3.dt5A9THjXtfDOwM5mBKCKcocknPWhV7vnxs0XbOtmqG938 - User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 In-Reply-To: <0f088c7c-ce5d-cf25-cfcf-150cd16122b0@yahoo.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16271 hermes_yahoo Apache-HttpAsyncClient/4.1.4 (Java/11.0.7) Content-Length: 489 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.6.130.40; envelope-from=mnaydin@yahoo.com; helo=sonic308-1.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/21 09:36:43 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: <8ddc4816-f85e-97b3-5c51-9b55acdcaca5@case.edu> <9881b6b4-237f-ea61-d9fc-9c3f9f9ae4c3@yahoo.com> <20200721114844.GQ22833@eeg.ccf.org> <5098cfe1-6de1-b22d-d8e9-a26ba0b3b991@yahoo.com> <20200721123005.GS22833@eeg.ccf.org> <0f088c7c-ce5d-cf25-cfcf-150cd16122b0@yahoo.com> Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16601 On 7/21/20 4:00 PM, M. Nejat AYDIN wrote: > On 7/21/20 3:30 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> I have no objection to bash's decision here.  I actually find it less >> surprising than dash's decision, although both are rational ones. > > I think dash is complying with POSIX here. I've overlooked this sentence from POSIX: If the system does not recognize the login name, the results are undefined. It seems the behaviour is undefined according to POSIX, so both decisions are acceptable.