Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Bob Proulx Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: announcing bashj Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 15:52:18 -0600 Lines: 14 Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <5B2EA307.3050002@tlinx.org> <75d5c76f-7839-bc9d-f401-80916d1f10a6@case.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1529790748 13652 208.118.235.17 (23 Jun 2018 21:52:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: bug-bash Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: bug-bash Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <75d5c76f-7839-bc9d-f401-80916d1f10a6@case.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 96.88.95.61 X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:14269 Chet Ramey wrote: > On 6/23/18 3:44 PM, L A Walsh wrote: > > Seems like the original missed being sent toe the bug-bash alias. > > It was not posted to bug-bash. For bug-bash was in the hold queue for human moderation. Although it seems off topic for this mailing list it has already had three replies in the thread and therefore I have now approved it and passed it on. For better or worse. For bash@packages.debian.org everyone subscribed to the package list got a copy from there already. Bob