Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Robert Elz Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: signals ignored in a subshell Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 20:25:26 +0700 Lines: 17 Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <23276.1586024838@jinx.noi.kre.to> <16086.1586068489@jinx.noi.kre.to> <45c766ba-4489-bd7b-40c7-32fed37461f9@case.edu> <11149.1586179526@jinx.noi.kre.to> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1586179565 17781 209.51.188.17 (6 Apr 2020 13:26:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu Cc: "chet.ramey@case.edu" , "bug-bash@gnu.org" To: =?UTF-8?B?T8SfdXo=?= Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:3c8:9009:181::2 X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <11149.1586179526@jinx.noi.kre.to> X-Mailman-Original-References: <23276.1586024838@jinx.noi.kre.to> <16086.1586068489@jinx.noi.kre.to> <45c766ba-4489-bd7b-40c7-32fed37461f9@case.edu> Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16098 Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 15:06:02 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?T8SfdXo=?= Message-ID: | Or, is it that when job controls are enabled each synchronous command is | run in its own process group and SIGINT is not sent to the shell at all? That would be correct. kre ps: the Subject of all of these messages is misleading, there hasn't been an example where a subshell is involved. There could be, but none of the test cases for the various issues so far have invoked one.