Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Lawrence_Vel=C3=A1zquez?= Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: performance bug of [[ $x ]] Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 00:56:47 -0500 Lines: 11 Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20200307225816.GA997327@chrisdown.name> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1583647017 15354 209.51.188.17 (8 Mar 2020 05:56:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu Cc: Chris Down , bug-bash@gnu.org To: Peng Yu Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=larryv.me; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=9 JIm7YW7/EtWKKuVAG48PX7QOxeCr6NWz+GwD1KAN4k=; b=ND2LDEU1AV9namSLE ANcYetv5qaJNO3kRbW4mRjhX9HHrh9PwqDsTOWAb3DrPuEhKVPBKzGuIz1vE65Xs +pkLiJtnA7YG2LZKM+6pE1rn4qyK/fpOBkA395iU9Vsoo29b1kWRgAyHlzhVtcs/ Z0Ex430ofXrIMQlYfc0s2eLGDpgWc0MfFVoJ/eLW5l46HERNzJ3MS8/L1vvG7nvF F5iamhl2OeNEs5foT5Wy42m6I1Zlba3jgLEih+/iFotkdx90Ri0miLCiC/JwfZDr Nd0ooAWGuKPImFcNFrFX9inrFf38drJhdTa8lvaqsrESOlJCKdB8OJnRRB7lsUos 8uptg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=9JIm7YW7/EtWKKuVAG48PX7QOxeCr6NWz+GwD1KAN 4k=; b=dAa0NUocOPYDzDtBTQczdFUpna0A5kYAzv7T86fj7+NEnCErgtubblg4j k/pP8PMhi1q/WYmM6hO6AkKSVhHKaLnS3BaD/pmJuZscKGc0ZE09DxN40JZNxoPY +RCNGM+mNizrmdctdp0k9muY7pI6ED8890nf22wM0Jrn4jMEHBCOt0mZiQujnhB0 RQFHQOhDYqUWQ7GLc2O7NCUUXGFZ96HLnJzd/8t9DxbCaTZ+7auFxgX29gttuz8q p4DWpuXa0DYJr9q+tDSXDfPNdz3qZokHjBWgT+NExYUgmaQJklXadi5vhK5idjS+ wwhNlvB1PqkeXfi9WwkjJnZrKSJEA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudduhedgledtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthejmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgrfihr vghntggvpgggvghljoiiqhhuvgiiuceovhhqsehlrghrrhihvhdrmhgvqeenucfkphepud dttddruddvrdduleekrddvgedtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvhhqsehlrghrrhihvhdrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.123.21 X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: <20200307225816.GA997327@chrisdown.name> Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16003 > On Mar 7, 2020, at 7:33 PM, Peng Yu wrote: > > Could you show me how you do the profiling for this specific case? > Based on what proof that you can conclude that it is not the `[[` > performance problem? That's kind of a weird framing. The burden of proof is on *you* to prove your assertion that `[[`, specifically, is causing a problem. vq