Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16747

Re: Dashes in function names: Undocumented?

Path csiph.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Matthew Persico <matthew.persico@gmail.com>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Dashes in function names: Undocumented?
Date Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:51:58 -0400
Lines 70
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.1740.1597247535.2739.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <CAL20dLDNniiOycTe-j6t0ynS+9FG32UgDGJbn+iDEMG7Ls_==Q@mail.gmail.com> <f53f8a84-ac66-6d61-7066-01c14e8f2ce4@archlinux.org> <CAL20dLBOLS-qwF0zTEeRWF29JRegxVw9ugbWduKnomHrC+mbXw@mail.gmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1597247536 6786 209.51.188.17 (12 Aug 2020 15:52:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc bug-bash@gnu.org
To Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wicHv+3K8Y7U2cfIqWbHGsPk7Hu8L1SeAvgSUbl9dAA=; b=LftHkmMUc38kynTNmJOUh/izaldpLXXEnbhuSZDOa9GOuexpg4pjP4PTTb1Q/GdlF2 kPrCjIcD2hjMTNpwLs4BY6MFS/bdqZTJE4dVFTM/DbWhSDGJXDIDVv62/z+zkUCaKicG z75Qy33cHNTlQNvNM7IB2RnMduju32YkzQ7qzKdMpkl4a/Af0eHYljSiEtzhQ3V4B67v x3RbQNV1gxDpcld3z+gMp6Ip/D/1/s1gNwnJh2eWEJGsCBcQ+l+Hd2v9WINTz5Y8p5EH ENZExOQkD0DfyrdOYB83gNLHg6O1PYi4ZCgH8u1K2QfDbcK8NBg0EhsG/rTj6pCf4RyG r2ng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wicHv+3K8Y7U2cfIqWbHGsPk7Hu8L1SeAvgSUbl9dAA=; b=mP+0AJ4+ebLQwSTDddi7j2gRWiwq+U6rl0H4BqbrjBuQ9qn9Mv9UGhBaEV7GnH038s 1JcB1e/+Rhihbmfa5sjWi2A6drgYt2B42rsyUyyClY8AT32NoY5kFJn/UQ04NhaHh3ds JzhD1dkl/6WyBqQozIxMg93hjGbY1f/CfKB7GwvCzip6M7rV9cPZOq3enO/KK5C0u1yl UdOXFWkidbTvBplNZxZEB6GdSe8VtyhhEwdoNWpN3KQsSSP9OTjGM8d9/ZhBeUuKNTm1 KzzZMoTeUsPuVeDERSJUsCdF8FG5kKcByXPrLBIQjNDIo+wS/YgJB6YyF1rPwgZET2eB idyg==
X-Gm-Message-State AOAM531IZq3cdscSL6KMVH0y+DwPx/8zXLLRZ8BU2JmuXY4exeVyaIIU HInnlaWj4gqs7utmFfhvlpL9QtbaVt00heLOxA8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source ABdhPJy5rpAiY8saHoxOKkI7R5Y3tAPnY6iadsYhg07jCNr41916mpnJOvahJl4xm6gl860dqph3OkePeHcDKMh/3rM=
X-Received by 2002:a67:fd5b:: with SMTP id g27mr692519vsr.230.1597247531683; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <f53f8a84-ac66-6d61-7066-01c14e8f2ce4@archlinux.org>
Received-SPF pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::e32; envelope-from=matthew.persico@gmail.com; helo=mail-vs1-xe32.google.com
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know.
X-Spam_score_int -20
X-Spam_score -2.1
X-Spam_bar --
X-Spam_report (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action no action
X-Content-Filtered-By Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.23
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <CAL20dLBOLS-qwF0zTEeRWF29JRegxVw9ugbWduKnomHrC+mbXw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <CAL20dLDNniiOycTe-j6t0ynS+9FG32UgDGJbn+iDEMG7Ls_==Q@mail.gmail.com> <f53f8a84-ac66-6d61-7066-01c14e8f2ce4@archlinux.org>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16747

Show key headers only | View raw


On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:06 AM Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org>
wrote:

> On 8/12/20 10:51 AM, Matthew Persico wrote:
> > I put a bug report into an emacs group because the bash syntax
> highlighter
> > failed to recognize functions whose names have dashes in them.
> >
> > The maintainer came back with this:
> >
> > I can reproduce this behaviour, but is it really a bug? Aren't the
> > names with '-' invalid?
> > The Bash Reference Manual says:
> > name
> >  A word consisting solely of letters, numbers, and underscores, and
> >  beginning with a letter or underscore. Names are used as shell
> >  variable and function names. Also referred to as an identifier.
> > https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/bash/manual/bash.html
> >
> > I looked at the manual and I didn't see positive or negative
> > acknowledgement that dashes can be used in function names. But it does
> work.
> >
> > Update to manual?
>
> The bash-20191127 snapshot updated the manpage documentation for a
> function definition (to align with reality). It is now defined as:
>
> function fname [()] compound-command [redirection]
>
> and includes the description:
>
> When in posix mode, fname must be a valid shell name and may not be the
> name of one of the POSIX special builtins. In default mode, a function
> name can be any unquoted shell word that does not contain $.
>
> For context:
>
> word  -  A sequence of characters considered as a single unit by the
> shell. Also known as a token.
>
> name  -  A word consisting only of alphanumeric characters and
> underscores, and beginning with an alphabetic character or an
> underscore. Also referred to as an identifier.
>
>
> > name
> >  A word consisting solely of letters, numbers, and underscores, and
> >  beginning with a letter or underscore. Names are used as shell
> >  variables. Also referred to as an identifier.
> >
> > function name
> >  A word consisting solely of letters, numbers, underscores, dashes, and
> >  beginning with a letter or underscore. Function names are used to label
> > shell
> >  functions.
> >
>
>
> --
> Eli Schwartz
> Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
>
>
Thanks. I will take your word for it, as I cannot seem to find that text at
https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/bash/manual/bash.html, unless
that is not the canonical location for the manual.

-- 
Matthew O. Persico

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: Dashes in function names: Undocumented? Matthew Persico <matthew.persico@gmail.com> - 2020-08-12 11:51 -0400

csiph-web