Path: csiph.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: Greg Wooledge Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: No word splitting for assignment-like expressions in compound assignment Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 07:38:42 -0400 Lines: 11 Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <6614fa7668daf7f2b450e319a28b624c@ispras.ru> <87o8o1zfpn.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <20200727113842.GR22833@eeg.ccf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1595849954 16654 209.51.188.17 (27 Jul 2020 11:39:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: bug-bash@gnu.org Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: bug-bash@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o8o1zfpn.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Received-SPF: none client-ip=139.137.100.1; envelope-from=wooledg@eeg.ccf.org; helo=mail.eeg.ccf.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/27 07:38:43 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <20200727113842.GR22833@eeg.ccf.org> X-Mailman-Original-References: <6614fa7668daf7f2b450e319a28b624c@ispras.ru> <87o8o1zfpn.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16624 On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 01:31:32AM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote: > So it seems like the word splitting in "A=(X$Z)" is incorrect. If the documentation doesn't support word splitting in that case, then it's the documentation that will need to change, not the shell. Word splitting in that context is *frequently* used in scripts. Never mind the fact that it's dangerous and wrong -- people use it, a lot. A change to the shell that would stop it from occurring would break countless scripts.