Re: foo | tee /dev/stderr | bar # << thanks!

From	worley@alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley)
Newsgroups	gnu.bash.bug
Subject	Re: foo \| tee /dev/stderr \| bar # << thanks!
Date	2020-07-06 21:45 -0400
Message-ID	<mailman.1073.1594086369.2574.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References	<202007041842.064Ig08v3769297@epjdn.zq3q.org> <87k0zgxfl4.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>

Show all headers | View raw

bug-bash@trodman.com writes:
>     foo | tee >(cat >&2) | bar

I do wonder how portable >( ... ) is in practice, versus the portability
of /dev/stderr.  Maybe I worry about the former because I'm not
practiced in named-FIFO programming and so think of it as non-universal.

Dale

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: foo | tee /dev/stderr | bar  # << thanks! worley@alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley) - 2020-07-06 21:45 -0400

csiph-web