Path: csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: worley@alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley) Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: Proposed new feature for bash: unbuffered pipes Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:39:09 -0400 Lines: 10 Approved: bug-bash@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87mu72pslg.fsf@igel.home> (schwab@linux-m68k.org) <87blnhvkki.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.gnu.org X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1587685167 25523 209.51.188.17 (23 Apr 2020 23:39:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu Cc: bug-bash@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Envelope-to: bug-bash@gnu.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20180828_2048; t=1587685153; bh=prVzkktJlOG2H8DCvhgDolpCzOBH3qBBCb+IxsLlKyU=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=eGkt9eRss8Br/VjopoxFAOEcoFrskcF6L84REKAADoSkQ81KfBiaKA6M4jE+Q/lbb AloWALkfFm8bCWI8y6RexDrk2WlK6uePzNvPIdmOt1VDc0d2FdMzwHkefLjNQbjLbr GS5NpWlXS16ItXK3wkUTLZRK33lSc/HIb82nazVJ2GKGKqk/KkuFIWFnfzMKZatD2V WFL0dLyg4iztZDXjuWdWPuC4eEB1uVPX8oPBdT28Ym9HHYhYd6wpZt40NXWxzPAwUM g6ZU69NEqz36V/qm9lNz0P0GlAdj3OVxFFyodDTgBO9USN0Ih+gc+w+9BdamVoSzSX U9QdkrNEfBiTQ== X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=-100.00;st=legit X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f In-Reply-To: <87mu72pslg.fsf@igel.home> (schwab@linux-m68k.org) Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:44; envelope-from=worley@alum.mit.edu; helo=resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/23 19:39:14 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Received-From: 2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:44 X-BeenThere: bug-bash@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <87blnhvkki.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> Xref: csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16232 Andreas Schwab writes: > See stdbuf(1). The limitation(s) of stdbuf are: It can only be applied to the standard I/O streams. It doesn't affect statically-linked executables. It only applies to a single executable, so if the command is a shell function or script, or creates subprocesses, it doesn't affect them. Dale