Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > free.biden.sucks > #18 > unrolled thread

Re: Republiscums/QAnon Block Ukraine Aid For Trump

Started byLark <remailer@domain.invalid>
First post2024-02-06 18:56 -0500
Last post2024-02-06 16:31 -0800
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to free.biden.sucks

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Republiscums/QAnon Block Ukraine Aid For Trump Lark <remailer@domain.invalid> - 2024-02-06 18:56 -0500
    Re: Republiscums/QAnon Block Ukraine Aid For Trump Klaus  Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> - 2024-02-06 16:31 -0800

#18 — Re: Republiscums/QAnon Block Ukraine Aid For Trump

FromLark <remailer@domain.invalid>
Date2024-02-06 18:56 -0500
SubjectRe: Republiscums/QAnon Block Ukraine Aid For Trump
Message-ID<20240206.185651.ae6c1c73@erienetworks.net>
In <1gywN.72943$U1cc.72704@fx04.iad> jonathan ball aka Max Boot 
<max.boot@lathymes.com> wrote:>
> On 2/6/2024 2:14 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, 
convicted child
> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>
>> In article <JTxwN.403152$p%Mb.93814@fx15.iad>, lb@cap.con says...
>>>
>>> On 2/6/2024 1:39 PM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds 
of times ? and
>>> *admits* it ? puled:
>>>
>>>> On 2/6/2024 4:21 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
>>>>> Behind the GOP?s shifting excuses for abandoning Ukraine
>>>>>
>>>>> By David Frum
>>>>> December 18, 2023
>>>>>
>>>>> The White House and Senate continue to work frantically toward 
a deal to
>>>>> supply Ukraine before Congress recesses for Christmas. 
Supposedly, all leaders
>>>>> of Congress are united in their commitment to Ukraine?so the 
new speaker of
>>>>> the House, Mike Johnson, insists. Yet somehow this allegedly 
united commitment
>>>>> is not translating into action. Why not?
>>>>>
>>>>> The notional answer is that Republicans must have a border-
security deal as
>>>>> the price for Ukraine aid. But who on earth sets a price that 
could stymie
>>>>> something they affirmatively want to do? Republicans have not 
conditioned
>>>>> their support for Social Security on getting a border deal. 
They would never
>>>>> say that tax cuts must wait until after the border is secure. 
Only Ukraine is
>>>>> treated as something to be bartered, as if at a county fair. 
How did that happen?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ukraine?s expendability to congressional Republicans 
originates in the
>>>>> sinister special relationship between Donald Trump and 
Vladimir Putin.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pre-Trump, Republicans expressed much more hawkish views on 
Russia than
>>>>> Democrats did. Russia invaded eastern Ukraine and annexed 
Crimea in spring
>>>>> 2014. In a Pew Research survey in March of that year, 58 
percent of
>>>>> Republicans complained that President Barack Obama?s response 
was ?not tough
>>>>> enough,? compared with just 22 percent of Democrats. After the 
annexation,
>>>>> Republicans were more than twice as likely as Democrats to 
describe Russia as
>>>>> personally, his rule was condemned by overwhelming majorities 
of both parties.
>>>>> Only about 20 percent of Democrats expressed confidence in 
Putin in a 2015 Pew
>>>>> survey, and 17 percent of Republicans.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump changed all that?with a lot of help from pro-Putin 
voices on Fox News
>>>>> and right-wing social media.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the beginning of Trump?s ascendancy in the GOP, even his 
future allies in
>>>>> Congress distrusted his pro-Russian affinities. Kevin 
McCarthy, a future House
>>>>> speaker, was inadvertently recorded in a June 2016 meeting 
with other
>>>>> Republican congressional leaders, saying, ?There?s two people 
I think Putin
>>>>> ?Swear to God.? (Dana Rohrabacher was a Republican House 
member from
>>>>> California, a notorious Putin apologist, and a joke figure 
among his caucus
>>>>> colleagues; despite almost 30 years? seniority in the House, 
he was kept away
>>>>> from major committee assignments.)
>>>>>
>>>>> 
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/12/republicans-
congress-ukraine-aid-trump/676374/
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump is a Putin tool. Republiscums/QAnon in Congress are 
blocking aid to
>>>>> Ukraine because Trump tells them to, because Trump is Putin's 
tool. Putin has
>>>>> instructed Trump to tell the Republiscums/QAnon in Congress to 
cut off aid to
>>>>> Ukraine.
>>>>
>>>> Screw Ukraine.
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>>> We can't afford it
>>>
>>> We can, and it is in our interest.
>>>
>>>> and the founding fathers
>>>
>>> Fuck off with your childish founders fetishism.
>>>
>>> The problem is the Republiscums/QAnon are not opposing the aid 
for any
>>> principled reason. It's only because Trump is Putin's tool and 
Trump is telling
>>> them to. The Republiscums/QAnon strongly support aid to Israel, 
which is *not*
>>> in our interest.
>>
>> It's supposed to be about the open border.
>
> There is no "open border." The "open border" lie was long ago 
demolished.

New York and much of the East Coast say you're a liar, Rudy.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#19

FromKlaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com>
Date2024-02-06 16:31 -0800
Message-ID<smj5si5sd2cbj4q2sq9uhn6drj03jukbdq@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com>
In reply to#18
[Default]  Lark <remailer@domain.invalid> typed:

>In <1gywN.72943$U1cc.72704@fx04.iad> jonathan ball aka Max Boot 
>aka Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza wrote:>

>> There is no "open border." The "open border" lie was long ago 
>demolished.
>
>New York and much of the East Coast say you're a liar, Rudy.

Much of the midwest, west, south, north, and West Coast say "Cunt
Flaps" is a liar, too.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | free.biden.sucks


csiph-web