Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > england.legal > #5

Police Reform Act 2002

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

""Thank you for your email sent to our office on 1 February 2024 in which 
you requested a review of your complaint made about the Metropolitan 
Police Service (MPS) on 3 November 2023.

The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) is the relevant review 
body for your complaint. [. . .]

[. . .]

I would like to take this opportunity to remind you of MOPAC’s role in 
the police complaints process. My role is to ensure that the MPS 
complaint handler fully understood and addressed your complaint and that 
their findings were logical based on the information and evidence 
available.

My role does not extend to reconsidering your complaint, or any 
subsequent matters you have raised following the conclusion of the 
complaint handling. However, I can recommend that a complaint is 
investigated should I identify any issues with the handling of this 
matter.

[. . .]

• I recommend that this matter is remedied according to paragraph 28ZA, 
Schedule 3, Police Reform Act 2002;"
said Mr. A Broad.

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thanks for the above. Acuity Law had recommended a law firm (5PL) for me 
to instruct but genocide in Gaza used to deprive that firm de capacity to 
represent me. So I telephoned Acuity Law instead yesterday. If neither de 
these firms has spare capacity to represent me or if they do not work in 
a relevant area de law, then please recommend to me the law firms that 
can represent me for paragraph 28ZA, Schedule 3, Police Reform Act 2002 
and that can represent me against wilful misconduct in public office by 
police officers and against wilful neglect of duty.

What are the relevant "Area[s] of practice"s in the search engine on
HTTPS://solicitors.LawSociety.org.UK/?Pro=True
?

Today's
MOPAC REVIEW OUTCOME - GLOSTER - PC1037523.pdf
lacks this fact: I sent a warning to Mister PC Caldwell on 06/08/2024.

I republish points de
MOPAC REVIEW OUTCOME - GLOSTER - PC1037523.pdf
via
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/PC_EH_Hills/MOPAC_REVIEW_OUTCOME_-_GLOSTER_-_PC1037523_Pages01-08.pdf
and
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/PC_EH_Hills/MOPAC_REVIEW_OUTCOME_-_GLOSTER_-_PC1037523_Pages15-16.pdf
and
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/PC_EH_Hills/MOPAC_REVIEW_OUTCOME_-_GLOSTER_-_PC1037523_Pages21-23.pdf
and
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/PC_EH_Hills/MOPAC_REVIEW_OUTCOME_-_GLOSTER_-_PC1037523_Pages28-29.pdf

I will republish via LinkedIn after a few seconds. (LinkedIn imposes tiny 
size limits so LinkedIn republications shall probably be smaller than 
this email.)

Yours faithfully,
Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter"
say I myself to MOPAC today.

HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/drochdhliodoiri/mu/Rioghachd_Aonaichte_na_Breatainne_Moire_agus_na_h-Eireann_a_Tuath/mun_Chuimrigh_agus_mu_Shasainn/PC_EH_Hills/2023-10-28b_I_see_no_convincing_evidence_that_they_counter_these_murderesses04.png

HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Scholastica_or_LinkedIn_connivance/

Back to england.legal | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Police Reform Act 2002 Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK> - 2024-09-12 22:57 +0200
  Re: Police Reform Act 2002 Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-04-06 00:43 +0200

csiph-web