Re: Firewall-Meldung

From	Dieter Schmickler <dieter.schmickler@t-online.de>
Newsgroups	de.comp.security.firewall
Subject	Re: Firewall-Meldung
Date	2023-02-08 13:42 +0100
Message-ID	<k4hjldFhg7mU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <trvsog$3pv7$3@dont-email.me> <k4hbjcFhg7mU1@mid.individual.net> <trvupg$3pv7$4@dont-email.me> <k4he9dFhg7jU2@mid.individual.net> <ts01gr$3pv7$9@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Am 08.02.23 um 12:36 schrieb Marco Moock:
> Mache mal einen Test mit nmap:
> nmap -p 1-65535 <deine IP>
> 
> Für UDP:
> nmap -p 1-65535 -sU <deine IP>
> 
  nmap -p 1-65535 192.168.2.101 
 

Starting Nmap 7.93 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2023-02-08 13:37 CET
Nmap scan report for dieter-ms7798 (192.168.2.101)
Host is up (0.000096s latency).
Not shown: 65527 closed tcp ports (conn-refused)
PORT      STATE SERVICE
111/tcp   open  rpcbind
631/tcp   open  ipp
1716/tcp  open  xmsg
2049/tcp  open  nfs
8200/tcp  open  trivnet1
20048/tcp open  mountd
36277/tcp open  unknown
45043/tcp open  unknown

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.36 seconds


sudo nmap -p 1-65535 -sU 192.168.2.101 
 

[sudo] Passwort für dieter:
Starting Nmap 7.93 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2023-02-08 13:38 CET
Nmap scan report for dieter-ms7798 (192.168.2.101)
Host is up (0.0000060s latency).
Not shown: 65528 closed udp ports (port-unreach)
PORT      STATE         SERVICE
111/udp   open          rpcbind
1716/udp  open|filtered xmsg
20048/udp open|filtered mountd
38421/udp open|filtered unknown
43148/udp open          unknown
47860/udp open          unknown
50509/udp open          unknown

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.54 seconds

Back to de.comp.security.firewall | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Firewall-Meldung Dieter Schmickler <dieter.schmickler@t-online.de> - 2023-02-08 10:55 +0100
  Re: Firewall-Meldung Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-02-08 11:15 +0100
    Re: Firewall-Meldung Dieter Schmickler <dieter.schmickler@t-online.de> - 2023-02-08 11:24 +0100
      Re: Firewall-Meldung Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-02-08 11:50 +0100
        Re: Firewall-Meldung Dieter Schmickler <dieter.schmickler@t-online.de> - 2023-02-08 12:10 +0100
          Re: Firewall-Meldung Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-02-08 12:36 +0100
            Re: Firewall-Meldung Dieter Schmickler <dieter.schmickler@t-online.de> - 2023-02-08 13:42 +0100
              Re: Firewall-Meldung Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-02-08 13:55 +0100
                Re: Firewall-Meldung Dieter Schmickler <dieter.schmickler@t-online.de> - 2023-02-08 14:22 +0100
                Re: Firewall-Meldung Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-02-08 14:24 +0100
                Re: Firewall-Meldung Dieter Schmickler <dieter.schmickler@t-online.de> - 2023-02-08 14:38 +0100
                Re: Firewall-Meldung Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-02-08 14:55 +0100
                Re: Firewall-Meldung Kay Martinen <usenet@martinen.de> - 2023-02-08 18:44 +0100
                Re: Firewall-Meldung Dieter Schmickler <dieter.schmickler@t-online.de> - 2023-02-09 08:12 +0100
  Re: Firewall-Meldung Laurenz Trossel <me@example.invalid> - 2023-02-08 10:20 +0000
    Re: Firewall-Meldung Dieter Schmickler <dieter.schmickler@t-online.de> - 2023-02-08 11:27 +0100
    Re: Firewall-Meldung Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-02-08 11:52 +0100
      Re: Firewall-Meldung Kay Martinen <usenet@martinen.de> - 2023-02-08 18:56 +0100
        Re: Firewall-Meldung Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-02-08 19:30 +0100

csiph-web