Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Arno Welzel Newsgroups: de.comm.software.mozilla.browser Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Das_war_es_dann=2c_zumindest_f=c3=bcr_mich=2e=2e=2e?= Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 17:07:13 +0200 Lines: 38 Message-ID: References: <87o8cf836d.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <60C33430.6DC22827@Berger-Odenthal.De> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net YN9eQPuCC+uNDgqyhtCUOA/WIuY0DtGLW6TxDDaclZUWaHcR38 Cancel-Lock: sha1:r9bcBl6h0tmJiYDsigtDTcpY0nw= In-Reply-To: <60C33430.6DC22827@Berger-Odenthal.De> Xref: csiph.com de.comm.software.mozilla.browser:62805 Axel Berger: > Arno Welzel wrote: >> Ja, Videokonferenzen ist ein Thema > > Zumindest Jitsi dokumentiert es ganz offen, daß sie eine nicht > standardisierte Funktion verwenden. Wenn auch nur ein Teilnehmen keinen > Chroem verwednet, müssen sie darauf verzichten und es wird für alle > langsamer. Wieso "nicht standardisiert"? Hast Du dafür eine genauere Quelle? Ich kenne nur das hier: Zitat: "We appreciate all the feedback ! Firefox has a very different implementation of the WebRTC SDP format than Chrome and we had decided to focus our efforts on keeping chrome up to date in the past. The WebRTC spec has evolved a lot in the last 1-2 years and all the browsers are merging towards WebRTC 1.0 which makes it easier for us. We have made a lot of progress on getting our Firefox and Safari support up to speed lately and we are in the process of merging these changes. This is how these implementation changes manifest to the users Signaling issues will be gone, i.e., one of the participants not receiving audio/video. Better video quality since we are introducing simulcast support for FF. Better statistics as we are moving to the spec compliant stats. I will update this issue once these changes make it to a Jitsi Meet release." -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de