Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Date | 2026-05-21 07:46 +0100 |
|---|---|
| Subject | Justice Dept. Sues DC Bar Over Disciplinary Action Against Trump Attorneys |
| Newsgroups | dc.politics, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.republicans, sac.politics, talk.politics.guns |
| From | Pelosi Goes To prison <noreply@mixmin.net> |
| Message-ID | <20260521.074656.459d4891@mixmin.net> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department is suing to block disciplinary proceedings by the District of Columbia Bar against attorneys who served in the Trump administration in a lawsuit that asserts politics not ethics violations is the key issue. The lawsuit argues that local authorities lack constitutional authority to police federal lawyers for conduct performed in their official roles. The dispute is a test of local jurisdiction over attorney accountability in Washington and has major implications for former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark and others who assisted Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The D.C. Bar counsel argues that Clark and other Trump administration attorneys violated Rules of Professional Conduct that ban dishonesty, fraud and deceit. Clark drafted a letter urging Georgia officials to reconsider election results based on claims of voter fraud that started with President Donald Trump. The Justice Department, as well as court judgments, Congress and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, later concluded that the voter fraud allegations were unsupported by evidence. A D.C. Bar disciplinary panel recommended that Clark lose his law license. Clark said in a message on X that he welcomed the lawsuit. “This is an important step to vindicate the separation of powers,” he wrote. Another Trump administration lawyer facing sanctions is Ed Martin, who currently serves as the Justice Department’s pardons counsel. Martin was the interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia when he told Georgetown Law School’s dean that his office would only hire the school’s students if the school discontinued its diversity, equity and inclusion program. Trump has called diversity, equity and inclusion programs discriminatory and not based on merit. He has sought to eliminate them in federal programs. Georgetown refused to change its policy. In March, the D.C. Office of Disciplinary Counsel accused Martin of professional misconduct for the letter he sent to Georgetown Law School’s dean last year that included the threat. Martin responded by calling the disciplinary counsel’s action “uneven behavior.” The Justice Department lawsuit raised similar complaints, saying, “The Office of Disciplinary Counsel and the Board on Professional Responsibility, as D.C. institutions, have no authority to decide whether a federal government attorney — no less the interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia — is upholding his oath of office or whether his official acts comport with the Constitution.” The lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia as United States v. Fox names Hamilton Fox and other D.C. disciplinary officials as defendants. “The D.C. Bar will no longer be permitted to probe sensitive executive branch deliberations and target executive branch officials with whom they happen to politically disagree, and federal attorneys will once again be free to share their candid legal advice with their bosses and colleagues,” Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward said in a Justice Department statement. Local disciplinary authority over lawyers is traditionally derived from the 1998 federal McDade-Murtha Amendment. It says government lawyers are bound by the state and local ethics rules where they practice. So far, the most prominent Trump administration lawyer disbarred in the District of Columbia is Rudy Giuliani, a former judge, New York mayor and personal attorney to Trump. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals ordered Giuliani’s disbarment in September 2024 after disciplinary authorities concluded he made false statements in litigation to challenge the 2020 presidential election that gave the victory to Joe Biden. The D.C. Office of the Disciplinary Counsel has not yet commented on the lawsuit or filed a response. https://www.thewellnews.com/law/justice-dept-sues-dc-bar-over-disciplinar y-action-against-trump-attorneys/
Back to dc.politics | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Justice Dept. Sues DC Bar Over Disciplinary Action Against Trump Attorneys Pelosi Goes To prison <noreply@mixmin.net> - 2026-05-21 07:46 +0100
csiph-web