Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.windows.x > #464
| From | kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc, comp.windows.x |
| Subject | Re: The COHERENT Operating System |
| Date | 2024-03-25 22:54 +0000 |
| Organization | Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) |
| Message-ID | <utsvac$ec4$1@panix2.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnv014ei.dne.bencollver@svadhyaya.localdomain> <X-20240325075426@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <utsq5g$14tqr$2@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In article <utsq5g$14tqr$2@dont-email.me>, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >On 25 Mar 2024 06:54:48 GMT, ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote in ><X-20240325075426@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>: > >> Ben Collver <bencollver@tilde.pink> wrote or quoted: >>>COHERENT version 4 was released in May of 1992 for $100 (around $219 >>>in 2024). This version made COHERENT a fully 32 bit operating system >>>and required at least an Intel 80386 CPU and 1MB of RAM. This version >>>also brought official support for X Windows and MGR to COHERENT for >>>the first time. This version was roughly compatible with UNIX SVR3. >> >> BTW: Probably "X Window" (the X Window System) is meant above, >> not "X Windows". > >BTDT: it was known as "X Windows", not "X Window". > >But officially, it was (and still is) "X" or "The X Window System". > >(I've been seeing a lot of folks refer to it as "X Window" >on Usenet lately -- you kids get off my lawn!) I thought it was the windows system known as X? --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Back to comp.windows.x | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: The COHERENT Operating System vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-03-25 21:26 +0000
Re: The COHERENT Operating System kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-03-25 22:54 +0000
Re: The COHERENT Operating System "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2024-03-26 10:19 +0000
csiph-web