Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.unix.ultrix > #34

Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB?

From Hans Bachner <Hans@Bachner.priv.at>
Newsgroups comp.os.vms, comp.unix.tru64, comp.unix.ultrix, comp.sys.dec
Subject Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB?
Date 2013-01-29 22:59 +0000
Organization ziemlich desorganisiert
Message-ID <ke9noj.6m.1@usenet.bachner.priv.at> (permalink)
References <5107daf4$0$26900$e4fe514c@dreader37.news.xs4all.nl> <ke9g95.64.1@usenet.bachner.priv.at> <ke9cqp$sdd$3@online.de>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Phillip Helbig---undress to reply <helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de> 
wrote:

> In article <ke9g95.64.1@usenet.bachner.priv.at>, Hans Bachner
> <Hans@Bachner.priv.at> writes: 
> 
>> Having said that, I'd give the DE500 a try; the DE450 is an
>> alternative, but not 100 mbit capable. 
> 
> Can the DE450 do FD or just HD?

Aren't all twisted-pair links FD capable? 

Don't have specs for the DE450 at hand... but
<http://www.aei-
it.com/support/download/pfec_download/Windows/WinNT4sp4/OEMSETUP.INF>
offers a "10BaseT Full_Duplex" connection setting.

But you need a manageable switch where you can set the port to 10/FD. An 
autonegotiating switch can sense the speed, but not duplex settings, and 
will usually fall back to half duplex if negotiation doesn't work out. I 
don't believe that autonegotiation properly works on this card.

Hans.

Back to comp.unix.ultrix | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? MG <marcogbNO@SPAMxs4all.nl> - 2013-01-29 15:21 +0100
  WTT: BA500-BA (or -AA) for mod.-DEGXA? MG <marcogbNO@SPAMxs4all.nl> - 2013-01-29 21:34 +0100
  Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? Hans Bachner <Hans@Bachner.priv.at> - 2013-01-29 20:51 +0000
    Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---undress to reply) - 2013-01-29 20:52 +0000
      Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? Hans Bachner <Hans@Bachner.priv.at> - 2013-01-29 22:59 +0000
        Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? Hans Bachner <Hans@Bachner.priv.at> - 2013-01-29 23:27 +0000
        Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---undress to reply) - 2013-01-30 06:19 +0000
    Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? MG <marcogbNO@SPAMxs4all.nl> - 2013-01-29 23:12 +0100
      Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? Hans Bachner <Hans@Bachner.priv.at> - 2013-01-30 00:44 +0000
        Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? MG <marcogbNO@SPAMxs4all.nl> - 2013-01-30 02:33 +0100
        Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? Hans Vlems <hvlems@freenet.de> - 2013-01-30 01:22 -0800
    Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? Hans Vlems <hvlems@freenet.de> - 2013-01-30 00:17 -0800
  Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? "John E. Malmberg" <wb8tyw@qsl.network> - 2013-01-29 17:21 -0600
    Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? MG <marcogbNO@SPAMxs4all.nl> - 2013-01-30 00:36 +0100
      Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> - 2013-01-29 16:18 -0800
        Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? MG <marcogbNO@SPAMxs4all.nl> - 2013-01-30 02:31 +0100
          Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? MG <marcogbNO@SPAMxs4all.nl> - 2013-01-30 02:39 +0100
        Re: Additional ethernet (e.g. 100BASE-TX) NIC for Multia/UDB? Dennis Grevenstein <dennis.grevenstein@gmail.com> - 2013-01-31 04:25 +0000

csiph-web