Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.unix.questions > #560

Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl

From Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com>
Newsgroups comp.unix.questions
Subject Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl
Date 2024-12-14 18:51 -0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87cyhuexvv.fsf@example.com> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <874j383n8h.fsf@example.com> <vjft9r$30pgt$1@dont-email.me> <87a5czgni9.fsf@example.com> <87y10jf8jx.fsf@example.com> <vjil2v$3mbam$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> writes:

> On Fri, 12/13/2024 6:49 PM, Salvador Mirzo wrote:

[...]

>> Someone (maybe you) suggested I should change my PuTTY terminal-type
>> string to vt100.  I did.  Same result:
>> 
>> $ uname -a
>> FreeBSD my.domain 14.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE-p5 GENERIC amd64
>> 
>> $ echo $TERM
>> vt100
>> 
>> $ rlwrap sbcl
>> This is SBCL 2.4.9, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
>> More information about SBCL is available at <http://www.sbcl.org/>.
>> 
>> SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
>> It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
>> BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
>> distribution for more information.
>> * (f(format t "hello~%")
>> hello
>> NIL
>> 
>
> The pattern is not suggestive of a $TERM problem, but it was
> worth trying a change anyway.
>
> Perhaps the rlwrap developer recognizes the pattern ?

Good idea.  I asked them at

  https://github.com/hanslub42/rlwrap/issues/194

Thanks for your attention, Paul!

Back to comp.unix.questions | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

xterm rlwrap sbcl Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2024-12-11 22:22 -0300
  Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-12 06:05 +0000
    Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-12 07:20 -0500
      Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2024-12-12 13:00 -0300
        Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-12 18:57 -0500
          Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2024-12-12 20:40 -0600
          Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2024-12-13 20:40 -0300
            Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2024-12-13 20:49 -0300
              Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-13 19:55 -0500
                Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2024-12-14 18:51 -0300
    Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2024-12-25 22:01 -0300
  Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2024-12-13 03:06 +0000
    Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2024-12-13 20:59 -0300
  Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 07:03 +0000
    Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-13 03:22 -0500
  Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Bozo User <anthk@disroot.org> - 2025-01-12 23:01 +0000
    Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2025-01-12 22:06 -0300

csiph-web