Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.unix.programmer > #16712
| From | cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.unix.programmer |
| Subject | Re: [meta] Harry Potter, Physics, Tools, Perception, etc. (was Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux?) |
| Date | 2024-12-12 00:55 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <vjdcak$k79$1@reader2.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <vj44hq$3q2ag$1@dont-email.me> <vj71t7$f5ah$1@dont-email.me> <vjagvt$15umg$1@dont-email.me> <vjarv0$17q4j$1@dont-email.me> |
In article <vjarv0$17q4j$1@dont-email.me>, Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote: >On 10.12.2024 23:57, James Kuyper wrote: >> On 12/9/24 10:21, Janis Papanagnou wrote: >>> On 09.12.2024 10:11, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote: >>>> On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 09:37:54 +0100 >> ... >>>>> WRT IRC you may have missed the requirements in my OP; one was: >>>>> * instantly/synchronously exchanging any typed characters >>>> >>>> I suggest you consult harry potter for that then. >>> >>> (I suppose here you just want play the troll.) But how does that >>> comment address in any way my question? - I don't know anything >>> about "Harry Potter", BTW; if you want to discuss that better >>> open an own post in an appropriate newsgroup. >> >> Key feature of "Harry Potter" - he lives in a world where magic is real. > >Thanks. - So much I knew of those books/films. :-) >It appears to be impossible to evade hearing of Harry Potter. ;-) >(I've even seen some, to be honest, but not sure I saw any film >completely. I like fantasy, but not this sort of fairy tales; >so it's useless to discuss that specific genre-variant with me.) > >It was merely meant as a hint to the poster to focus on the topic >if there's any intention to seriously contribute (which his post, >in content and tone, obviously anyway didn't intend). > >> This is Muttley's way of telling you that he thinks that your >> specification can only be achieved by using magic, that it's >> incompatible with the real world. >> Taken literally, "instantly" is indeed impossible, but I doubt that you >> intended it literally. > >Given that in Relativity Theory instant transmission is impossible - >light (electromagnetic waves) and information can travel only with >light speed! - and that quantum entanglement in Quantum Theory is >unlikely to have been in my mind when talking about our profane IT >tools theme, it should indeed have been obvious - but probably not >to Muttley - that it's of course not meant literally. - It was the >colloquial "instantly" used in a comparison to the other ways tools >typically communicate. > >What was meant, if not obvious, I think could be easily derived >from my original post already, where I mentioned three prevalent >types of typical systems; write a complete message and <send> it >(to be seen at the addressee), write a line and <send> it, and - >what I meant - while typing the peer could see what you type (and >without an explicit <send>). - I'm sure most people understood it, >given their responses. - And tools with such characteristic have >also already been proposed. Taking what you wrote literally is an obtuse reading of the original requirements, indeed. It's rather obvious that the requirement was character-at-a-time transmission, as opposed to batching into larger messages (lines or otherwise). >Only Muttley seems to didn't get it, especially given that he >suggested things like IRC (that were clearly ruled out in my OP), >and that he's obviously never seen tools like the ones mentioned >(by me and others here); 'phone' and the various 'talk' variants. > >(I postpone or ignore posts from people that behave like him. My >longish post might help him to understand, or maybe not - I don't >care much.) Muttley's the guy who doesn't know what a compiler is, right? - Dan C.
Back to comp.unix.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-08 13:47 +0100
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-08 13:14 +0000
ytalk (Was: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-12-08 17:18 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-09 16:32 +0100
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? John McCue <jmccue@whitedwf.jmcunx.com> - 2024-12-08 14:15 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-08 16:25 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-08 18:06 +0100
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-12-08 18:36 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-09 08:25 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-12-09 12:49 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-09 17:06 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-12-09 17:11 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Nicolas George <nicolas$george@salle-s.org> - 2024-12-09 17:56 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-09 08:23 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-09 09:37 +0100
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-09 09:11 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-12-09 14:27 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-09 16:21 +0100
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-09 17:13 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-12-10 17:57 -0500
[meta] Harry Potter, Physics, Tools, Perception, etc. (was Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux?) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-11 03:04 +0100
Re: [meta] Harry Potter, Physics, Tools, Perception, etc. (was Re: Text Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-11 08:37 +0000
Re: [meta] Harry Potter, Physics, Tools, Perception, etc. (was Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux?) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-12-12 00:55 +0000
Re: [meta] Harry Potter, Physics, Tools, Perception, etc. (was Re: Text Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-12 08:39 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-11 08:35 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-12-11 19:47 -0500
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-12-09 14:02 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2024-12-09 13:45 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-12-09 14:23 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 14:27 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2024-12-09 15:02 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Nicolas George <nicolas$george@salle-s.org> - 2024-12-09 15:23 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2024-12-11 13:36 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-09 19:30 +0000
Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-10 08:36 +0000
csiph-web