Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.unix.programmer > #16712

Re: [meta] Harry Potter, Physics, Tools, Perception, etc. (was Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux?)

From cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups comp.unix.programmer
Subject Re: [meta] Harry Potter, Physics, Tools, Perception, etc. (was Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux?)
Date 2024-12-12 00:55 +0000
Organization PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID <vjdcak$k79$1@reader2.panix.com> (permalink)
References <vj44hq$3q2ag$1@dont-email.me> <vj71t7$f5ah$1@dont-email.me> <vjagvt$15umg$1@dont-email.me> <vjarv0$17q4j$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


In article <vjarv0$17q4j$1@dont-email.me>,
Janis Papanagnou  <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On 10.12.2024 23:57, James Kuyper wrote:
>> On 12/9/24 10:21, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
>>> On 09.12.2024 10:11, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 09:37:54 +0100
>> ...
>>>>> WRT IRC you may have missed the requirements in my OP; one was:
>>>>> * instantly/synchronously exchanging any typed characters
>>>>
>>>> I suggest you consult harry potter for that then.
>>>
>>> (I suppose here you just want play the troll.) But how does that
>>> comment address in any way my question? - I don't know anything
>>> about "Harry Potter", BTW; if you want to discuss that better
>>> open an own post in an appropriate newsgroup.
>> 
>> Key feature of "Harry Potter" - he lives in a world where magic is real.
>
>Thanks. - So much I knew of those books/films. :-)
>It appears to be impossible to evade hearing of Harry Potter. ;-)
>(I've even seen some, to be honest, but not sure I saw any film
>completely. I like fantasy, but not this sort of fairy tales;
>so it's useless to discuss that specific genre-variant with me.)
>
>It was merely meant as a hint to the poster to focus on the topic
>if there's any intention to seriously contribute (which his post,
>in content and tone, obviously anyway didn't intend).
>
>> This is Muttley's way of telling you that he thinks that your
>> specification can only be achieved by using magic, that it's
>> incompatible with the real world.
>> Taken literally, "instantly" is indeed impossible, but I doubt that you
>> intended it literally.
>
>Given that in Relativity Theory instant transmission is impossible -
>light (electromagnetic waves) and information can travel only with
>light speed! - and that quantum entanglement in Quantum Theory is
>unlikely to have been in my mind when talking about our profane IT
>tools theme, it should indeed have been obvious - but probably not
>to Muttley - that it's of course not meant literally. - It was the
>colloquial "instantly" used in a comparison to the other ways tools
>typically communicate.
>
>What was meant, if not obvious, I think could be easily derived
>from my original post already, where I mentioned three prevalent
>types of typical systems; write a complete message and <send> it
>(to be seen at the addressee), write a line and <send> it, and -
>what I meant - while typing the peer could see what you type (and
>without an explicit <send>). - I'm sure most people understood it,
>given their responses. - And tools with such characteristic have
>also already been proposed.

Taking what you wrote literally is an obtuse reading
of the original requirements, indeed.  It's rather
obvious that the requirement was character-at-a-time
transmission, as opposed to batching into larger
messages (lines or otherwise).

>Only Muttley seems to didn't get it, especially given that he
>suggested things like IRC (that were clearly ruled out in my OP),
>and that he's obviously never seen tools like the ones mentioned
>(by me and others here); 'phone' and the various 'talk' variants.
>
>(I postpone or ignore posts from people that behave like him. My
>longish post might help him to understand, or maybe not - I don't
>care much.)

Muttley's the guy who doesn't know what a compiler is,
right?

	- Dan C.

Back to comp.unix.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-08 13:47 +0100
  Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-08 13:14 +0000
    ytalk (Was: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-12-08 17:18 +0000
    Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-09 16:32 +0100
  Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? John McCue <jmccue@whitedwf.jmcunx.com> - 2024-12-08 14:15 +0000
    Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-08 16:25 +0000
      Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-08 18:06 +0100
        Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-12-08 18:36 +0000
          Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-09 08:25 +0000
            Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-12-09 12:49 +0000
              Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-09 17:06 +0000
                Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-12-09 17:11 +0000
                Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Nicolas George <nicolas$george@salle-s.org> - 2024-12-09 17:56 +0000
        Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-09 08:23 +0000
          Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-09 09:37 +0100
            Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-09 09:11 +0000
              Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-12-09 14:27 +0000
              Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-09 16:21 +0100
                Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-09 17:13 +0000
                Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-12-10 17:57 -0500
                [meta] Harry Potter, Physics, Tools, Perception, etc. (was Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux?) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-12-11 03:04 +0100
                Re: [meta] Harry Potter, Physics, Tools, Perception, etc. (was Re: Text Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-11 08:37 +0000
                Re: [meta] Harry Potter, Physics, Tools, Perception, etc. (was Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux?) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2024-12-12 00:55 +0000
                Re: [meta] Harry Potter, Physics, Tools, Perception, etc. (was Re: Text Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-12 08:39 +0000
                Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-11 08:35 +0000
                Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-12-11 19:47 -0500
        Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-12-09 14:02 +0000
      Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2024-12-09 13:45 +0000
        Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-12-09 14:23 +0000
        Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 14:27 +0000
          Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2024-12-09 15:02 +0000
        Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Nicolas George <nicolas$george@salle-s.org> - 2024-12-09 15:23 +0000
          Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2024-12-11 13:36 +0000
        Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-09 19:30 +0000
          Re: Text based synchronous communication tool for Linux? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-10 08:36 +0000

csiph-web