Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 12:58:49 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <87cyr6jk06.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <20240329084454.0000090f@gmail.com> <uu6om5$cmv8$1@dont-email.me> <20240329101248.556@kylheku.com> <uu6t9h$dq4d$1@dont-email.me> <20240329104716.777@kylheku.com> <uu8p02$uebm$1@dont-email.me> <20240330112105.553@kylheku.com> <uudrfg$2cskm$1@dont-email.me> <87r0fp8lab.fsf@tudado.org> <uuehdj$2hshe$1@dont-email.me> <87wmpg7gpg.fsf@tudado.org> <LISP-20240402085115@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <LISP-20240402091729@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <wrap-20240402092558@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <uui7hf$3gona$1@dont-email.me> <uuj1o5$3pvnq$1@dont-email.me> <87plv6jv1i.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <uuk06h$1fnl$1@dont-email.me> <87le5ujrd0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <uukav6$403m$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 19:58:55 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a67faaad1a2f17d94ae762a9e9871bf2"; logging-data="145077"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18C4OrfozQ/baDq2xhrk8ry"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZEcDHO/5mKZfoRxARyxuJ/V8sFU= sha1:4xfO4EBhmeMCZljm4SSORw9NFAo=
Xref: csiph.com comp.unix.shell:24932 comp.unix.programmer:15679 comp.lang.misc:10353

David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
> On 03/04/2024 19:19, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
>>> On 03/04/2024 18:00, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
>> [...]
>>>>> That's probably the reason almost no one uses it.  That post is the
>>>>> first time I have ever seen conditional expressions outside of a brief
>>>>> mention in a tutorial on Python conditionals showing how to write
>>>>> normal conditionals in the language.  I think Python stole this one
>>>>> from Perl.
>>>> No, Perl's conditional expressions use the same syntax as C's.
>>>
>>> I am not very familiar with Perl, and don't know what are expressions
>>> or statements.  Perhaps I have been imagining things.  I had the idea
>>> that in Perl you could write "<do_this> if <condition>" as an
>>> alternative to the more common imperative language ordering "if
>>> <condition> then <do_this>".
>> Yes, but it's not the same thing.  Perl has postfix conditionals, so
>> you
>> can write:
>>      statement if condition;
>> but that's a statement, not an expression, and there's no form
>> equivalent to if/else.  It's a specific case of "statement modifiers",
>> where the keyword can be any of if, unless, while, until, for, foreach,
>> or when.  (The latter is for an experimental "switch" feature, disabled
>> by default in recent releases.)
>
> OK.  That's a lot more than I knew.
>
> However, I don't see a relevant distinction between a statement and an
> expression as particularly significant here, at least in terms of code 
> clarity.

One distinction is that, for example, you can't use
    statement if condition;
as part of a larger expression.  Also, there's no else clause.

Perl's statement modifiers are an alternative syntax for conditional
*statements*.  In particular, `statement if condition;` is equivalent to
`if (condition) { statement; }`.  Their purpose is to allow some code to
be written more concisely.  (Note that an if statement or other compound
statement requires { and }.)

Perl adopted C's ?: syntax for conditional expressions with little or
no change.

[...]

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Medtronic
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */