Path: csiph.com!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Salvador Mirzo Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer Subject: Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 18:10:22 -0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <86frm4x4g1.fsf@example.com> References: <86wmflc83k.fsf@example.com> <86pllaklwb.fsf@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 22:10:29 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ff40e98a2cbd208907c566a62a411985"; logging-data="1903806"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+61Xal8feXwwIoUk+/CmsH5pd5l60bOm8=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:loJtibUKvRfyAdXrvPngmkYdd70= sha1:6FuTuzCMPSZ3HfHlndO87HaMcf4= Xref: csiph.com comp.unix.programmer:16830 kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) writes: > Salvador Mirzo wrote: >> kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) writes: >> >>> Eric Pozharski wrote: >>>> Yay! The joy of building redhat. Expect your >>>> build dependencies being inadequate, missing, >>>> or plainly wrong. Just saying. >>> >>> After some minor spec file tweaking, I managed to do >>> *one* successful TB build, but because Rust compiler can >>> hog almost 16GB of memory, most of the time I just >>> cannot build TB using my modest Lenovo laptop. OOM >>> killer kicks in and destroys the build. >>> >>> I never could have believed that having 16GB of >>> RAM and 8GB of swap is not enough for building TB! >> >> You did it. Thanks for sharing the experience. > > With some incredible luck, it worked out *once*. :-) That also explains why some people were skeptical here. Even with a sophisticated system to make the compilation succeed, it's still not without a thrill.