Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Simply defining =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=B6del?= Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V24 (Are we there yet?) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:12:02 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 30 Message-ID: <87h7u7z0bx.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <87365vnik3.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87a703lz5c.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87pn8ykrwq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <7e-dnQpoj9jkoZPCnZ2dnUU7-UHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <875zapk0bb.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87lfjkixu6.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87a700ic7t.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <874kq8iab9.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87sgdsgstv.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <_a6dnc6TmNMJWpLCnZ2dnUU7-N_NnZ2d@giganews.com> <87blkfh4zg.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <8rKdnZMbAoXxNY3CnZ2dnUU7-eednZ2d@giganews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="02ec520d1b2b3210c7ee6ae74092840a"; logging-data="1583"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18DMBRHbZIpURv/qVjLYB0n" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8mE9SXeU4TXH3UhiQ72aau/pJto= sha1:1PmNgZP1IXT4F1zeEK2nzTLr/sg= Xref: csiph.com comp.theory:21710 olcott writes: > On 7/16/2020 10:08 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> olcott writes: >>> On 7/15/2020 8:19 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>>> olcott writes: >> >>>>> Ultimately for the entire body of all analytical knowledge truth is >>>>> the mathematical mapping from expressions of language to Boolean true. >>>> >>>> It's not just any mapping, it's a very specific one, and you don't have >>>> the right mind set to learn what that mapping is. Why should anyone >>>> take you seriously when you can't show that you know what you are >>>> talking about? >>> >>> Maybe you are still stuck on FOL. My expression also applies to >>> formalized naturual language. >> >> You don't know what true means in /any/ formalism yet. And I don't think >> you want to know. You prefer to pontificate. I am happy to leave to do >> that. > > My other much more elaborate response that I spent an hour on > addresses these these issues. Not to anyone's satisfaction other than your own. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com Working, but not speaking, for Philips Healthcare void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */