Path: csiph.com!2.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.unit0.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Manfred Lotz <manfred.lotz@arcor.de>
Newsgroups: comp.text.xml
Subject: > or &gt;
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:33:23 +0100
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <20170130213323.44a3c525@arcor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net nCsWCj+qHPbChWlvaruGNw2Iuqayn8TddMkjN84m8kRCMaR+Vf
X-Orig-Path: news.bsd.localnet!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4oeUUsOuDw1LJZW5CztX1CFgeM0=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Xref: csiph.com comp.text.xml:877

Hi there, 
Let us assume I have the following document t.xml

<?xml version="1.0"  encoding="utf-8"?>
<entry>
   bla --> more bla
</entry>


Running xmllint t.xml gives a "corrected' output with &gt;. instead of
>.

However, xmllint doesn't return a non zero return code which means
(if I understand xmllint correctly) that from xmllint's point of view
the document is well formed.

Question: Is the above document really well formed? Or is it required
to have &gt; instead of '>'?

-- 
Manfred