Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.text.interleaf > #26
| Newsgroups | comp.text.interleaf |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 08:41 -0700 |
| References | <fa75e3a4.0203122018.60f3b23b@posting.google.com> |
| Message-ID | <02c8de3b-deaa-4667-8a64-1145fe81de39@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: pl2ps question |
| From | ajuratli@gmail.com |
On Wednesday, 13 March 2002 08:18:10 UTC+4, Randy Winfrey wrote: > I am doing some consulting for a local company which is using version > 4 of Interleaf on a VAXstation running VMS. (Yes, I tried to tell them > to upgrade a long time ago.) They have used it for a long time and > have written a number of programs specific to their business which > generate ASCII markup input for Interleaf. > > We need to generate a Postscript output file, which we then want to > convert to PDF file, maybe with Ghostscript. (This version of > Interleaf does not have an option to generate Postscript directly from > the desktop.) > > It seems like the pl2ps filter ought to do the trick: just generate > the Printerleaf file and use pl2ps (Version 4.0.5) to generate the > Postscript. I have tried > > pl2ps -usage > > and got a list of the options. I have tried the obvious > > pl2ps -i my_file.pl -o my_file.ps > > and the less obvious (from a logical name IWS4_??_ARGV, didn't write > down the name) > > pl2ps -i my_file.pl -o my_file.ps -v -T pslw+ -r 1270 -RV > > In either case, the program prints the contents of a file, > pspro.ps_4_0_5, to the screen, then prints an error message > > unable to figure which lfu to use > > No output file is produced. > > A search through this group and other places revealed that pl2ps has a > well deserved reputation for user hostility. Does anyone know what the > proper > options/syntax would be? > > Thanks!
Back to comp.text.interleaf | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: pl2ps question ajuratli@gmail.com - 2016-04-10 08:41 -0700
csiph-web