Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > comp.sys.transputer > #608

Re: New transputer board

Date 2025-08-03 14:28 +1000
Subject Re: New transputer board
Newsgroups comp.sys.transputer
References <1049kdr$129ok$1@dont-email.me> <104h7ds$32u2l$1@dont-email.me> <10517v2$2vn52$1@dont-email.me>
From David Arnold <davida@pobox.com>
Message-ID <Y5KdnVnPCb_peBP1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@supernews.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/14/25 07:20, Oscar Toledo G. wrote:
> On 7 Jul 2025 at 13:33:13 CST, "Andy Rabagliati" <andyr@wizzy.com> wrote:
>> On 7/5/25 00:26, Oscar Toledo G. wrote:

>> What do you do with the other three TRAM links ?

> The extra 3 links aren't connected.
> 
> I couldn't determine if there is a standard for connection, but now I think I
> could expose at the very least the links in a connector. And it would need
> also a way to disable the board port decoding to avoid conflicts.

I vaguely remember someone using 0.1" headers on a ribbon cable, and 
someone else using RJ45 (or perhaps RJ11) connectors, and CSA's 
Transputer Education Kits used 8-pin MiniDIN connections (with 
LocalTalk-compatible cables, I think?)

I don't think there was an official standard?




d

Back to comp.sys.transputer | PreviousPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

New transputer board Oscar Toledo G. <biyubi@gmail.com> - 2025-07-04 22:26 +0000
  Re: New transputer board Andy Rabagliati <andyr@wizzy.com> - 2025-07-07 21:33 +0200
    Re: New transputer board Oscar Toledo G. <biyubi@gmail.com> - 2025-07-13 21:20 +0000
      Re: New transputer board David Arnold <davida@pobox.com> - 2025-08-03 14:28 +1000

csiph-web