Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.tandy > #674
| From | Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.tandy |
| Subject | Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake |
| References | <87k00rccyy.fsf@sc1f1dan.com> <d951f43f-7213-444b-8fe1-f11fb7f127e5n@googlegroups.com> <87fsbac9um.fsf@sc1f1dan.com> <443a45b0-382d-47cd-9e56-651332de3a08n@googlegroups.com> <87ttznb6al.fsf@sc1f1dan.com> |
| Message-ID | <87cz68bvar.fsf@sc1f1dan.com> (permalink) |
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Date | 2023-02-17 07:33 +0000 |
Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> writes: > Black Epyon <Blackepyon01@yahoo.ca> writes: > >> David, >> >> Not all scopes have the component test feature, but I've included a >> picture of mine in use to see what it's like (excuse that my bench is >> a mess). >> https://www.mediafire.com/view/a70m3v1s40jgcsr/comp_test_on_Beckman_scope.jpg/file >> The closer the resultant waveform is to the manual, the better the >> component is. The testers we linked earlier can give more precise >> details, but if your scope has this, it's a general indication of the >> health of the component. > > Thanks. I'm now shopping for, hopefully, a used and inexpensive scope. > > Daniel Well I went through and removed all the caps from the 100. What a BITCH. I complained about how hard it was to melt some of the solder and, in the process of doing it, some of the cap posts are still attached to the board because I simply can't get the solder to melt. I was told, on the bitchin list that it's due to some caked in flux and was given some tricks on how to get it removed. I'm shopping for an electronic solder sucker that won't break the bank. Fingers crossed I find a used one. Meanwhile, the replacement cap kit came in the mail and they are of good quality. Glad the kit only cost around $5. Daniel
Back to comp.sys.tandy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-09 11:09 +0000
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Walt Perko <r4rguy@gmail.com> - 2023-02-10 02:53 -0800
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Black Epyon <Blackepyon01@yahoo.ca> - 2023-02-10 07:55 -0800
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Walt Perko <r4rguy@gmail.com> - 2023-02-10 08:09 -0800
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-13 07:21 +0000
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-13 07:19 +0000
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-13 07:17 +0000
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Black Epyon <Blackepyon01@yahoo.ca> - 2023-02-13 07:42 -0800
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Walt Perko <r4rguy@gmail.com> - 2023-02-13 10:38 -0800
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-15 09:56 +0000
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Walt Perko <r4rguy@gmail.com> - 2023-02-15 03:35 -0800
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-17 07:30 +0000
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Black Epyon <Blackepyon01@yahoo.ca> - 2023-02-16 01:01 -0800
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-17 07:31 +0000
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Walt Perko <r4rguy@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 03:56 -0800
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-20 10:18 +0000
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-03-01 07:21 +0000
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Walt Perko <r4rguy@gmail.com> - 2023-03-01 15:56 -0800
Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-17 07:33 +0000
csiph-web