Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.sys.tandy > #674

Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake

From Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com>
Newsgroups comp.sys.tandy
Subject Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake
References <87k00rccyy.fsf@sc1f1dan.com> <d951f43f-7213-444b-8fe1-f11fb7f127e5n@googlegroups.com> <87fsbac9um.fsf@sc1f1dan.com> <443a45b0-382d-47cd-9e56-651332de3a08n@googlegroups.com> <87ttznb6al.fsf@sc1f1dan.com>
Message-ID <87cz68bvar.fsf@sc1f1dan.com> (permalink)
Organization Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date 2023-02-17 07:33 +0000

Show all headers | View raw


Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> writes:

> Black Epyon <Blackepyon01@yahoo.ca> writes:
>
>> David,
>>
>> Not all scopes have the component test feature, but I've included a
>> picture of mine in use to see what it's like (excuse that my bench is
>> a mess).
>> https://www.mediafire.com/view/a70m3v1s40jgcsr/comp_test_on_Beckman_scope.jpg/file
>> The closer the resultant waveform is to the manual, the better the
>> component is. The testers we linked earlier can give more precise
>> details, but if your scope has this, it's a general indication of the
>> health of the component.
>
> Thanks. I'm now shopping for, hopefully, a used and inexpensive scope.
>
> Daniel

Well I went through and removed all the caps from the 100. What a
BITCH. I complained about how hard it was to melt some of the solder
and, in the process of doing it, some of the cap posts are still
attached to the board because I simply can't get the solder to melt.

I was told, on the bitchin list that it's due to some caked in flux and
was given some tricks on how to get it removed.

I'm shopping for an electronic solder sucker that won't break the
bank. Fingers crossed I find a used one.

Meanwhile, the replacement cap kit came in the mail and they are of good
quality. Glad the kit only cost around $5.

Daniel

Back to comp.sys.tandy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-09 11:09 +0000
  Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Walt Perko <r4rguy@gmail.com> - 2023-02-10 02:53 -0800
    Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Black Epyon <Blackepyon01@yahoo.ca> - 2023-02-10 07:55 -0800
      Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Walt Perko <r4rguy@gmail.com> - 2023-02-10 08:09 -0800
        Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-13 07:21 +0000
      Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-13 07:19 +0000
    Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-13 07:17 +0000
      Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Black Epyon <Blackepyon01@yahoo.ca> - 2023-02-13 07:42 -0800
        Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Walt Perko <r4rguy@gmail.com> - 2023-02-13 10:38 -0800
        Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-15 09:56 +0000
          Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Walt Perko <r4rguy@gmail.com> - 2023-02-15 03:35 -0800
            Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-17 07:30 +0000
          Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Black Epyon <Blackepyon01@yahoo.ca> - 2023-02-16 01:01 -0800
            Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-17 07:31 +0000
              Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Walt Perko <r4rguy@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 03:56 -0800
                Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-20 10:18 +0000
                Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-03-01 07:21 +0000
                Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Walt Perko <r4rguy@gmail.com> - 2023-03-01 15:56 -0800
          Re: expected outcome of a dumb mistake Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-02-17 07:33 +0000

csiph-web