Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 12:41:10 -0500 Message-ID: <55256831.609DB804@nomail.com> Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 13:41:05 -0400 From: Gary X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin Subject: Re: Nodename issue References: <552462AC.AD63534C@nomail.com> <552510b1$0$2945$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <55252745$0$2854$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 25 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-NkwMMYgRI2hxrIN5xJx1fGIiIX+EAj11uAMXnLngMpp9iZgx4V9IwleEJJXqq9jmOk5t68H2bELNikf!me6kXERCVqy9nj6HgEOUImkRSo2tRwk++sB8bTXRYLdYJ6J44D/3FQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2230 Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.sun.admin:242 Didn't think of that! Good point. For what it's worth I've encountered the same issue on newer versions of Solaris as well. I'll see if I can find time to test the change to /etc/default/dhcp on one of my lab boxes. "Casper H.S. Dik" wrote: > Michael Moeller writes: > > >Perhaps it's important to say the server is a Cisco business router. > >Afaik it doesn't care about the clients names and I changed them at > >times without difficulty. Since it worked before the fault is likely > >to be client sided. None of the other machines names were altered by > >DHCP. > > Is it the name returned by DNS? > > I believe you can remove what the DHCP client asks for by > editing /etc/default/dhcp and drop the hostname (param 12) > > But Solaris 2.6 is, of course, a very old release (end of 1997?) > and a lot of things have changed; I also do not have a Solaris 2.6 > system to check this on. > > Casper