Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.sun.admin > #270
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.sun.admin |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-01-20 07:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <200e1c5d-3ce8-46d0-a37b-d90119db78f8@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | calibration of water quality |
| From | Amare Shiberu Keraga <akeraga32@gmail.com> |
I have got 3 simulation results of SWAT model corresponding to three years' LU/LC data since I am interested to see impact of LU change on water quality. I assume that there is a need to calibrate flow, sediment and finally water quality (nutrients) sequentially because of my thought that one is a carrier of the other. But calibrating all 3 years' flow, sediment and nutrient is tedious (yearly, monthly or daily) with shortage of data at hand. Should I use the same best_pars (the one I got in calibrating the first result) for all the three cases and in all the three years? So, what reasonable approach may I follow to get a logical conclusion of effect of LU change on water quality? thanks.
Back to comp.sys.sun.admin | Previous | Next | Find similar
calibration of water quality Amare Shiberu Keraga <akeraga32@gmail.com> - 2018-01-20 07:06 -0800
csiph-web