Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Andy Burns Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: More on wifi range - Pi PICO W Oil level sensor Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 05:18:29 +0000 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <10h8unl$oq21$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net H2+THxwHRgDLtzbrxqjVrgPNxgPBp31u9N5kXS4IWj+dNzT8jJ Cancel-Lock: sha1:3+aKyL/A9MAeRwEF133JW6fGaOo= sha256:ZH6nhLsx+5dvTr57av3sOmutT7yxlaFuPBAqWXJML7U= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.raspberry-pi:37395 comp.os.linux.misc:78628 c186282 wrote: > If monitoring 'emergency vehicles/installations' >   is critical, maybe consider something using lower >   frequencies than wi-fi ??? Nah, it was mostly "for interest" to gather a few more values from kit that's already being monitored. Someone else mentioned water (presumably as rain) don't forget the fire appliances carry around their own water, but hopefully it's low down for CoG reasons, while the access points are mounted higher up.