Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!panix!not-for-mail From: Cydrome Leader Newsgroups: comp.sys.prime Subject: Re: A curiosity from the eighties... Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <2c87e046-1dcc-42f0-804b-d0be29479e64@googlegroups.com> <7bKdncSpGrzcBrfMnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@giganews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1362776299 26787 166.84.1.2 (8 Mar 2013 20:58:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:58:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/2.0.0-20110823 ("Ardenistiel") (UNIX) (NetBSD/5.1.2 (i386)) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.prime:187 Bill Gunshannon wrote: > In article <7bKdncSpGrzcBrfMnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) writes: >> > Mine are older. And say IBM on the edge. :-) >> >> Ah, but which is less common? :) > > No flowcharting template is "common" today. Like much of the original > programming art flowcharting is no longer in vogue. no flowcharting is why so much software sucks these days.