Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!news.building-m.net!.POSTED.localhost!not-for-mail
From: John <john@building-m.simplistic-anti-spam-measure.net>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.misc
Subject: Re: Retrocomputing
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 23:06:51 +0000
Organization: Building M
Message-ID: <86mszozwxg.fsf@building-m.net>
References: <86cz0npquo.fsf@building-m.net> <slrnublo5d.1cat.anthk@openbsd.my.domain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: ritvax.building-m.net; posting-host="localhost:::1"; logging-data="2981950"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@building-m.net"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2JcEw3habkm6rxjNJi/fApRSmmw=
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.misc:22

bozo user <anthk@disroot.org> writes:

> On 2023-07-19, John <john@building-m.simplistic-anti-spam-measure.net> wrote:
>> Anybody ever notice that the structure of comp.sys is basically ready
>> laid for retrocomputing discussion? More or less everything that was
>> current back when the hierarchy was defined is now a historical
>> artifact.
>>
>> john
> Ironically, accesing FIDO and DOVEnet thru nntp, cvs.synchro.net:119
> gives you actual discussions on modern themes (also, talks over 
> retro systems) with over two
> ancient protocols stacked over...

Interesting, do they peer?

john